Monday, February 28, 2011

The Fulfillment of the Feasts of the Lord

Introduction

At the core of the Mosaic Covenant are the seven annual festivals set forth in Leviticus 23, known as the Feasts of the Lord:  Passover, Unleavened Bread, Firstfruits, Weeks (Pentecost), Rosh Hashana (Trumpets), Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement), and Tabernacles.  The first three are grouped together in the spring, the fourth is in early summer, and the last three are again grouped together in the autumn.  The timing of these holy days is of crucial significance.  The first four festivals commemorated—to the exact day—the major events of the Exodus.  In fact, one of the Hebrew words translated “feast” or “festival” literally means “appointed time.”  The precise day in the Hebrew lunar calendar was appointed to commemorate the Passover event, with the eating of unleavened bread. Then the miraculous deliverance through the Red Sea, which occurred three days later, was celebrated on the feast of Firstfruits.  Fifty days after Firstfruits, the Lord revealed Himself to Moses on Mt. Sinai, and this event is commemorated in the feast of Weeks.

These annual festivals also served a prophetic purpose: They prophesied, again to the exact day, the crucial events by which the Messiah would accomplish the salvation of His people.  Jesus, the Lamb of God—“our Passover Lamb,” as Paul calls Him (1Cor.5:7)—was crucified on Passover.  He was the Unleavened Bread, the sinless Bread of Life, that experienced no decay in the tomb (Acts 2:31).  And at the “appointed time” of Firstfruits, He was resurrected from the dead, as Paul declares:  “But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep.” (1Cor.15:20) Fifty days after that fulfillment of Firstfruits occurred the feast of Weeks, or Pentecost, described in Acts 2.  Moses’ encounter with the Lord on Mt. Sinai inaugurated the Old Covenant people of God, amid thunder, fire and smoke.  Likewise, at Pentecost, the New Covenant people of God were empowered by the Holy Spirit, and the church inaugurated, with a noise like a mighty wind and with tongues of fire.

The fulfillment of the first four Feasts gives us assurance that the last three, the autumn feasts of Trumpets, Atonement, and Tabernacles, will be fulfilled just as precisely when the Lord Jesus Christ returns, in royal and irresistible power, to judge the life of every human being.






Part I:  The Fulfillment of the Spring Feasts

1.  From Egypt to Sinai

We begin with the historical events comprising the Exodus.  There is little reason to doubt that these are historical events.  The record of them in the books of Moses is by far the most meticulously preserved and carefully detailed of all records from that period.  Ever since archeologists excavated the site of ancient Troy, there are few who doubt that Homer’s account of the Trojan War, though full of poetic invention, is based on an actual war fought about two centuries after the Hebrew Exodus.  Archeology has similarly corroborated the Biblical account, which, though it includes poetry, is mostly a sober historical narrative.  The only serious reason for doubting its substantial authenticity is that it describes numerous divine miracles.  If we accept that the God of the Bible is real, however, that reason for doubt disappears.  The information I am presenting here concerning the Feasts of the Lord furnishes powerful evidence, atop the mountain of other evidence, that God is real and His word is true.  If we had even a fraction of this kind of evidence showing that the Homeric gods were real, we would (or ought to) read the Iliad and the Odyssey rather differently.

We are commonly taught that God told Moses to demand from Pharaoh the release of the Hebrew people from slavery and from Egypt.  That was the ultimate outcome, but it wasn’t the demand.  This is what the Lord told Moses to say:  “The Lord, the God of the Hebrews, has met with us.  Let us take a three-day journey into the desert to offer sacrifices to the Lord our God.” (Ex.3:18)  And that is exactly what Moses did say at the outset of his long contest with Pharaoh (Ex.5:1-3).  As the Lord had already made clear to Moses, there was no way Pharaoh was going to give a ready consent; but if he had, the Hebrews would have been morally obliged to return after the three days.  That was, or would have been, the deal.  After the fourth plague Pharaoh did consent to the three-day journey but then immediately reneged (8:25-32).  Prior to the final plague, the death of the firstborn, the Lord told Moses:  “After that, he will let you go from here, and when he does, he will drive you out completely.” (11:1)   So he did (12:31-32), but once again he had second thoughts and went after them with his army (14:5-9).

We know from Ex.12:1-14 that the Passover event occurred on the 14th of Abib (later called Nisan)—that is, the unblemished lambs, having been chosen on the 10th, were slain on the afternoon of the 14th and their blood applied to the doorways.

The LORD said to Moses and Aaron in Egypt,
“This month [Abib, later called Nisan, corresponding to March/ April] is to be for you the first month, the first month of your year.  Tell the whole community of Israel that on the tenth day of this month each man is to take a lamb for his family, one for each household.  ...    The animals you choose must be year-old males without defect, and you may take them from the sheep or the goats.  Take care of them until the fourteenth day of the month, when all the people of the community of Israel must slaughter them at twilight. Then they are to take some of the blood and put it on the sides and tops of the doorframes of the houses where they eat the lambs.


“That same night they are to eat the meat roasted over the fire, along with bitter herbs, and bread made without yeast.  Do not eat the meat raw or cooked in water, but roast it over the fire—head, legs and inner parts.  Do not leave any of it till morning; if some is left till morning, you must burn it.  This is how you are to eat it: with your cloak tucked into your belt, your sandals on your feet and your staff in your hand. Eat it in haste; it is the LORD's Passover.


“On that same night I will pass through Egypt and strike down every firstborn—both men and animals—and I will bring judgment on all the gods of Egypt. I am the LORD.  The blood will be a sign for you on the houses where you are; and when I see the blood, I will pass over you. No destructive plague will touch you when I strike Egypt.


“This is a day you are to commemorate; for the generations to come you shall celebrate it as a festival to the LORD—a lasting ordinance.” (Ex.12:1-14)

That same night the Israelites departed.  They first traveled to Succoth to retrieve the bones of Joseph (13:17-20), then encamped at Etham.  The next day they traveled to Pi Hahiroth, by the Red Sea (14:1-2), and it was on the third day after the Passover that Pharaoh’s army caught up with them.  Throughout the night, the cloud and fire of the Lord held the Egyptians at bay as the Israelites passed through the parted waters, and at daybreak Pharoah and his army were drowned (14:19-31) and God’s people were miraculously delivered.

From the Red Sea they journeyed through the deserts of Marah and Sin, and then:  “In the third month after the Israelites left Egypt—on the very day—they came to the Desert of Sinai.”(Ex.19:1)  The Expositor’s Bible Commentary says that this was in the seventh week following the Exodus.  So on the same day of the week as the Passover, seven weeks later, they arrived at Mt. Sinai.  Next there followed a three-day period to consecrate the people (19:10-11), and thus it was seven weeks after the Red Sea deliverance that Moses ascended the mountain to meet with the Lord and receive His commandments.  Counting both Sundays (the Jews counted both first and last items in a series) that makes fifty days.  I believe there is substantial reason to accept the age-old Jewish teaching that the interval between the feasts of Firstfruits and Weeks commemorates, to the exact day, the journey from the Red Sea to Sinai.


2.  The Appointed Times for the Feasts

In Leviticus 23 (see also Ex.12, Num.28, and Deut.16), the Lord gave His people instruction concerning the Sabbath day and the annual feasts.  It begins:  “The Lord said to Moses, ‘Speak to the Israelites and say to them:  “These are My appointed feasts, the appointed feasts of the Lord, which you are to proclaim as sacred assemblies.” (1-2)  “Appointed feasts” here translates the Hebrew word mo’ed, which basically means an appointed and fixed time.  Later the Lord declared expressly, “I choose the appointed time [mo’ed].” (Ps.75:2)  “Assemblies” translates the Hebrew mikrah, meaning a summoned assembly or convocation.  In Scripture, mikrah is almost always preceded by the word qodesh, meaning “holy.”  There were seven of these holy convocations during their religious year, coinciding with the seven Feasts.  Thus mo’ed emphasizes the timing of the Feasts, while mikrah brings out their essential character as sacred assemblies, holy convocations.  A third Hebrew word, chag (noun) or chagag (verb), also meaning “feast” or “keep the feast,” highlights the Feasts as times for rejoicing in the Lord and celebrating His goodness.  Thus the psalmist exults, “When I remember these things, I pour out my soul in me:  for I had gone with the multitude, I went with them to the house of God, with the voice of joy and praise, with a multitude that kept holyday [chagag].” (Ps.42:4 KJV)  Taken together, these three main Hebrew words for “feast” give us a rounded view of the meaning of the Lord’s Feasts.

Leviticus 23 continues:

These are the Lord’s appointed feasts [mo’ed], the sacred assemblies
          [mikrah] you are to proclaim at their appointed times [mo’ed]:  The
          Lord’s Passover begins at twilight on the fourteenth day of the first
          month.  On the fifteenth day of that month the Lord’s Feast [chag] of
          Unleavened Bread begins; for seven days you must eat bread made
          without yeast.  On the first day hold a sacred assembly [mikrah] and
          do no regular work. (4-7)

The unleavened bread memorializes the hasty urgency of that original Passover night, and it also symbolizes the purging out of sin.

The instruction for the third Feast, Firstfruits, comes next in Leviticus 23:  “The Lord said to Moses, ‘Speak to the Israelites and say to them:  “When you enter the land I am going to give you and you reap its harvest, bring to the priest a sheaf of the first grain you harvest.  He is to wave the sheaf before the Lord so it will be accepted on your behalf; the priest is to wave it on the day after the Sabbath.” (9-11)  The Sabbath here refers to the next weekly Sabbath following Passover (Nisan 14), and not, as the Pharisees later understood it to be, the Nisan 15 mikrah Sabbath which begins the feast of Unleavened Bread.  This is evident from the instructions a few verses later for determining the date of the feast of Weeks:  “From the day after the Sabbath, the day you brought the sheaf of the wave offering, count off seven full weeks.  Count off fifty days up to the day after the seventh Sabbath, and then present an offering of new grain to the Lord.” (15-16)  The interval is seven weeks, and since the feast of Weeks occurs on the day after a weekly Sabbath, the feast of Firstfruits must do likewise. By Biblical reckoning both feasts fall on a Sunday.

By following the Lord’s orders for the original Passover, the Israelites were delivered both from the death of all the firstborn sons and from slavery in Egypt. After their conquest of the Promised Land they began the annual commemorative festivals, and have continued them ever since—even though, during periods of widespread apostasy, only the faithful “remnant” were keeping the Feasts, and even though, ever since the crucifixion of Christ, all the Jews who reject Him as Messiah have been keeping the Feasts in spiritual blindness and ignorance (see Romans 11).


3.  The Appointed Times for the Fulfillment

New Testament Greek has a word, kairos, which is synonymous with the Hebrew mo’ed, “appointed time.” Kairos is used particularly in connection with the Messiah’s mission to save His people from their bondage to sin and death; it emphasizes the sovereignty of God in ordaining and carrying out His plan of salvation.  It was at the appointed time that the Holy Spirit conceived the Son of God in the virgin’s womb:  “But when the time [kairos] had fully come, God sent His son, born of a woman, born under law, to redeem those under law, that we might receive the full rights of sons.” (Gal.4:4-5)  At the appointed time, Jesus began His public ministry:  “After John was put in prison, Jesus went into Galilee, proclaiming the good news of God.  ‘The time [kairos] has come,’ He said.  ‘The kingdom of God is near.  Repent and believe the good news!’” (Mark 1:15)  At the appointed time, Jesus laid down His life as a voluntary sacrifice for sin:  “For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself as a ransom for all men—the testimony given in its proper time [kairos].” (1Tim.2:5-6; see also Rom.5:6)  And at the appointed time, the Messiah will come again:  “Therefore judge nothing before the appointed time [kairos]; wait till the Lord comes.” (1Cor.4:5)  In his gospel, John uses hora, the Greek word for “hour,” in much this same sense of an appointed time (see John 2:4, 7:8, 13:1).

As the parable of the fig tree (Matt.24:32-33) indicates, we can discern from the signs of the times when the Lord’s “appointed times” are drawing near, but He has told us definitely that “It is not for you to know the times or dates [kairos] the Father has set by His own authority.” (Acts 1:7)  This means that although Christ’s second coming will fulfill the autumn Feasts as precisely as His first coming has already fulfilled the spring Feasts, we will not be able to pin down the details in advance.  He wants us to be on the watch (see Mark 13:32-37), but still, as always, His ways are going to surprise us.

For many centuries there have been questions and debate about the timing of events during the week of Christ’s crucifixion. The main question has to do with an apparent difference between the first three Gospels and John.  Matthew, Mark and Luke state plainly and repeatedly that the Last Supper was the Passover meal.  That meal, by a law that goes to the heart of the Hebrew religion, had to include a lamb slaughtered in the temple between 3:00 and 5:00 p.m. on Nisan 14, roasted, and eaten that same evening.  The Hebrew word for Passover, pesach, beyond its root meaning of an exempting or “passing over” (see Ex.12:12-14), had come to be used of the Passover lamb itself.  As long as the Israelites were in the land and the temple was still standing—that is, up until 70 A.D.—Passover could not be celebrated without the lamb.  Thus, according to the chronology of these Gospels, Jesus would seem to have been crucified on the day after Passover, that is, on Nisan 15.

According to John, however, during the trial of Jesus, “the Jews led Jesus from Caiaphas to the palace of the Roman governor. By now it was early morning, and to avoid ceremonial uncleanness the Jews did not enter the palace; they wanted to be able to eat the Passover.” (John 18:28)  This seems to indicate that Jesus was crucified on the 14th, on Passover itself, rather than on the 15th.

Can these apparently disagreeing accounts be reconciled?  They can, but there is also another consideration, and a preeminent one.  Jesus died in fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy; at the heart of all that prophecy are the feasts of Passover, Unleavened Bread, and Firstfruits.  In the mind of God this is clearly a matter of first importance, since He is the one who ordained the Feasts, with their significant details and exact timing.  He is the one who inspired the writers of Scripture to identify Jesus, repeatedly and positively, as the ultimate Passover lamb, the lamb sacrificed so that those who are “under the blood” will be spared from destruction.  The most profound and explicit of all Old Testament prophecies of the Messiah says that

he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all.  He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth. (Isa.53:5-7)

At the outset of Jesus’ public ministry, John the Baptist identified Him by shouting out, “Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the world!” (John 1:29)  Peter declares that we have been redeemed “with the precious blood of Christ, a lamb without blemish or defect.” (1Peter 1:19)  Paul affirms that “Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.” (1Cor.5:7)  In John’s revelatory vision of the heavenly throne room, he says, “Then I saw a Lamb, looking as if it had been slain, standing in the center of the throne ....”  Then he hears the worshippers singing to the Lamb:  “You are worthy to take the scroll and to open its seals, because you were slain, and with your blood you purchased men for God from every tribe and language and people and nation.” (Rev.5:9)

As the fulfillment of all that the Passover lamb signified, Jesus had to be sacrificed on Nisan 14.  In fulfilling His messianic role, however, it was just as vital that He lead His disciples in celebrating the Passover meal, because He used the main symbolic elements of that meal—specifically the unleavened bread and the wine—to transform the meal into the Lord’s Supper, or Holy Communion, the central rite by which Christians celebrate the New Covenant.  But the Passover meal, of course, has to come after the sacrifice of the lambs, and we are back to the puzzle of the differing Gospel accounts.  Was Jesus crucified on the day after Passover, as the first three Gospels suggest, or was He crucified on Passover itself, as John suggests?  Can both versions be right?

Various solutions to this problem have been proposed. Other commentators, either reluctantly or, if unbelieving, sometimes gleefully, have concluded that there is no solution; the accounts differ, and that is that.  Among the proposed solutions there are two which I believe to be perfectly plausible—and one of them must be right, since the word of God cannot ultimately disagree with itself, and since two paramount truths are at stake:  that Jesus celebrated the Passover meal with His disciples, and that He was sacrificed as “our Passover lamb” on Nisan 14.

Both of the two plausible solutions are based on historical evidence that different ways of reckoning time were in use among the Jews in the first century.  In particular, the two most powerful religious/political parties, the Pharisees and the Sadducees, differed over the religious calendar.  According to the first solution, the disagreement concerned the day on which the year should begin, with the Pharisees starting it one day earlier.  (Nisan was the first month, and ascertaining the first day involved sighting the new moon.)  In the year of Christ’s crucifixion (either A.D. 30 or 33), the Pharisees placed Nisan 14 on Thursday.  Following this reckoning, Jesus’ disciples sacrificed their lamb in the temple on Thursday afternoon and celebrated Passover with their Lord in the Upper Room that evening (as we are told in Matt.26:17-20, Mark 14:12-16, and Luke 22:7-14).  It was the Sadducees whom John referred to as refusing to enter Pilate’s palace on Friday morning because they wished to avoid defilement and thus be able to eat the Passover that evening (John 18:28); for them, Nisan 14 came on Friday.  This solution to the problem assumes an accommodation between the two parties whereby they agreed to the dual Passover dating; but such an accommodation is likely, given the political power of both parties.

The second solution is similar.  It rests on evidence that the difference in time reckoning, for religious purposes, had to do with whether the day begins at sunset or at sunrise.  There is considerable evidence in the Bible that both ways of marking a day had been used in Israel from the earliest times.  (For further information and documentation on this issue, see Harold W. Hoehner’s excellent study, Chronological Aspects of the Life of Christ.)  Moreover, there is some evidence that both the Pharisees and (regionally) the Galileans counted days from sunrise to sunrise, while the Sadducees and the Judeans counted from sunset to sunset.  Being Galileans, Jesus and His disciples would have regarded Nisan 14 as beginning on Thursday morning and would have sacrificed their lamb that afternoon and had their Passover meal that evening.  For the Sadducees, however, Nisan 14 extended from sunset on Thursday to sunset on Friday, and so they would have sacrificed their lambs on Friday afternoon.  (The same accommodation between the two parties regarding the dual Passover is assumed.)  And since the Sadducees controlled the temple services, the paschal lamb—the one lamb chosen to be sacrificed on behalf of the whole nation—would have been slain at 3:00 p.m. on Friday, the same time at which Jesus died on the cross.

According to either of these two solutions, then, the sequence of events during Holy Week would have been as follows:

1. The instructions for the Passover in Exodus 12 required each family to select an unblemished lamb on Nisan 10 and to take care of it until the 14th, when it was to be slain.  During the time of Christ, on the 10th of Nisan the high priest led a festive procession out of Jerusalem to nearby Bethany, where an unblemished lamb was selected as the Passover sacrifice for the whole nation (each family or group also sacrificed their own lamb or kid).  The priests then led this lamb back into the city along a road lined with thousands waving palm branches and singing Psalm 118:

     The LORD is my strength and my song; he has become my salvation.  Shouts of joy and victory resound in the tents of the righteous:  “The LORD's right hand has done mighty things!” . . .
               Open for me the gates of righteousness; I will enter and give thanks to the Lord.  This is the gate of the Lord through which the righteous may enter.  I will give you thanks, for you answered me; you have become my salvation.
          The stone the builders rejected has become the capstone; the LORD has done this, and it is marvelous in our eyes.  This is the day the LORD has made; let us rejoice and be glad in it.  O Lord, save us; O Lord, grant us success.
               Blessed is he who comes in the name of the LORD. From the house of the LORD we bless you.  The LORD is God, and he has made his light shine upon us. With boughs in hand, join in the festal procession up to the horns of the altar. (v.14-27)

For the timing of this ceremony the priests would have followed the Sadducean calendar, where Friday was Nisan 14 and the 10th came on Monday.

John’s testimony informs us that Jesus arrived in Bethany “six days before the Passover” and made His triumphal entry on the next day (12:1,12).  John too appears to reflect the Sadducean calendar (he refers to the Jewish officials planning to eat the Passover on Friday), and so six days before Passover, counting inclusively in the Jewish fashion, would be the previous Sunday. Thus it was on Monday that Jesus entered the city; Palm Sunday and Easter are a later development in Christian tradition and are less accurate historically.  On Nisan 10, then, Jesus left Bethany and entered Jerusalem to the acclaim of the same crowds who had just celebrated the entry of the yearling lamb whose role Jesus was appointed to fulfill.  Some acclaimed Him because they had come to believe He was the Messiah, many because they had seen some of His miracles or heard about them, and many others no doubt were just caught up in the excitement of the moment, as Jesus came riding a donkey in fulfillment (as Matt.21:4-5 tells us) of Zech. 9:9:  “Rejoice greatly, O Daughter of Zion! Shout, Daughter of Jerusalem! See, your king comes to you, righteous and having salvation, gentle and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.”

2. The paschal lamb was tethered for four days on public display in the temple, so that everyone could confirm that it was indeed without blemish.  After driving out the money changers, Jesus spent those same four days in the temple courts healing and teaching, bearing intense public scrutiny and foiling His adversaries’ efforts to discredit Him.

3. The appointed time came for the Messiah to fulfill His chosen destiny.  On Thursday afternoon (Nisan 14 by Pharisaic/Galilean reckoning) He told the disciples, “Go into the city to a certain man and tell him, ‘The Teacher says:  My appointed time [kairos] is near.  I am going to celebrate the Passover with my disciples at your house.’” (Matt.26:18)   Jesus knew the times and seasons; He knew the Feasts most intimately, what they signified, how and exactly when they would be fulfilled.  On that same night, after the Passover meal in the Upper Room, Jesus was arrested, tried, flogged, and sentenced to be crucified.

4. On Friday morning at the third hour (9:00 a.m.), the paschal lamb was bound to the altar.  At the same time (Mark 15:25) Jesus was nailed to the cross outside the city walls.  Then for six hours the lamb and the Lamb approached death.  At noon the sun was shuttered and darkness covered the land (Luke 23:44-45).  At the ninth hour (3:00 p.m.), the high priest ascended the altar, slew the paschal lamb with one swift knife stroke, and pronounced the ritual words “It is finished.”  After uttering the same words (John 19:30) at the same time (Matt.27:46), Jesus gave up His spirit, and “at that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom.  The earth shook and the rocks split.” (Matt.27:51)  Imagine the scene in the temple:  With a strange darkness fallen outside, the high priest sheds the lamb’s blood, pronouncing the words of fulfillment, and at that moment the earth itself trembles while the great curtain before the Holy of Holies is supernaturally torn asunder.  As all those in attendance gape in awe or terror, the Lord of the temple, the grieving Father, rends His garment and opens the way for His people to enter into His very presence (Heb.10:19-22).


            In eating the Passover meal with His disciples, Jesus identified Himself with their humanity—He was one of them.  In becoming the Passover Lamb Himself, He manifested His deity: He was the real, though unrecognized, object of His people’s worship.  Thus the prophesied Messiah, the holy Son of God, was rejected and scorned by His people and tortured to death at their behest, at the same time that His sacrifice on their behalf was being unwittingly celebrated in the nearby temple.  The extreme irony that played out on that earthshaking day is beyond expression.

Summing up, the timing of Holy Week is as follows: On Nisan 10, Monday, Jesus entered Jerusalem, offering Himself to Israel as their Messiah.  On Thursday evening He ate the Passover meal with His disciples.  On Friday He was crucified and then entombed before the Sabbath began at sunset, as the Gospels tell us.  For three days and nights—Jewish rabbis taught that any part of a day counts as a whole twenty-four-hour day—He lay in the heart of the earth.  And on Sunday morning, the feast of Firstfruits, He was raised from the dead.

Recall now the three-day journey which God told Moses to ask for.  As it turned out, a three-day journey was the final outcome—three days from when they left Egypt to when they crossed the Red Sea.  Recall the reason for the journey:  so that they might offer sacrifices to the Holy One of Israel.  Now we can see why God specified a three-day period for offering sacrifices—because He knew the end from the beginning.  The Lamb of God “was chosen before the creation of the world, but was revealed in these last times for your sake.” (1Peter 1:20)  Since the events of Holy Week occurred “by God’s set purpose and foreknowledge” (Acts 2:23), He knew that His Son would be sacrificed at the appointed time—the same time the lambs were slain on the original Passover in Egypt.  He knew that Jesus would be laid in the tomb before the Sabbath began at sunset on Friday.  He knew that the sacrificed Lamb, the Unleavened Bread of Life, would lie dead during the Sabbath (the Hebrew word means “rest”).  And He knew that on the third day, on the feast of Firstfruits, Jesus would be raised from the dead, because that was how He planned it and that was how He did it.

        “I am God, and there is no other;
         I am God, and there is none like me.
I make known the end from the beginning,
From ancient times, what is still to come.
I say:  My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please. . . .
What I have said, that will I bring about;
What I have planned, that will I do.” (Isa.46:9-11)

Since the feasts of Passover and Unleavened Bread are fixed to days of the month, while Firstfruits is fixed to a day of the week (the first), the interval between Passover and Firstfruits varies from year to year.  The fact that the interval was the same—three days—in the year of the Exodus and the year of the Redeemer is yet more testimony to the sovereignty of God in working out His plan of salvation. The coincidence of Firstfruits with the Red Sea crossing might be considered merely fortuitous if it were not for the evident involvement of a purposeful God.



Part II:  What the Fulfillment Means

Now, let’s review what we are looking at here.  First, we have the historical events comprising the Exodus—that is, the Passover, recounted in Exodus 12, the crossing of the Red Sea in Exodus 14, and the giving of the Ten Commandments in Exodus 19-20.  These are the events by which the Mosaic Covenant was established, and they are commemorated, to the exact day, in the first four Feasts.  And these first four Feasts, again to the exact day, predict the historical events by which the New Covenant was established fifteen centuries later:  the crucifixion, burial and resurrection of Jesus, and the coming of the Holy Spirit in power on the feast of Pentecost (Weeks).  The Feasts extend through history like laser beams, aligning the Passover in Egypt with the crucifixion outside Jerusalem, the Red Sea crossing with the resurrection from the tomb, and the giving of the Law on Mt. Sinai with the outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost.  The Lord’s “appointed times” are kept with amazing precision.

Just as remarkable as the timing of these events is the profound and precise correspondence of their meaning.  Let’s compare them in their appointed sequence.


Passover

The first of the annual feasts, Passover, connects the historical Passover with the crucifixion of Christ.  The Hebrew people, descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, had been enslaved in Egypt for four hundred years.  God sent Moses to be the agent of their deliverance from bondage.  To effect this deliverance, an unblemished yearling lamb had to be chosen (one for each household) and slain, and its blood painted on the doorframe.  That night the Lord would kill all the firstborn sons of Egypt, but “the blood will be a sign for you on the houses where you are; and when I see the blood, I will pass over you.”(Ex.12:13)  The correspondence between this Passover and the crucifixion of Christ has long been understood, in part because the New Testament often refers to it.  All of us, in our natural state, are enslaved to sin.  In order to save us from our doomed condition (and it was the only possible way), God sent His own Son to be the agent of our deliverance from bondage.  The “Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29), shed His blood on the cross in order to effect that deliverance.  The spiritual cleansing power of Christ’s blood is applied to our heart when we trust in Him as our Savior.  And thus both the Old and the New Covenant express the universal spiritual truth that the heart of love is sacrifice, that “without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.” (Heb.9:22)  “This is how we know what love is:  Jesus Christ laid down his life for us.  And we ought to lay down our lives for our brothers.”(1John 3:16)


Unleavened Bread

The second of the annual feasts, Unleavened Bread, begins on the day after Passover and continues for seven days.  Historically, it connects the unleavened bread that was baked and eaten on that momentous night in Egypt with Jesus, who is the bread of life, whose body, symbolized by unleavened bread, suffered no decay while it lay dead in the tomb.  Bread is of course a staple food in many societies, just as rice, potatoes, and maize are in others.  It is a basic necessity, a source of bodily life.

In the original instructions for the feast of Unleavened Bread, the Israelites were told:  “For seven days you are to eat bread made without yeast.  On the first day remove the yeast from your houses, for whoever eats anything with yeast in it from the first day through the seventh must be cut off from Israel.” (Ex.12:15)  The severity of the punishment—excommunication and banishment, if not death—underlines the seriousness of what yeast usually symbolizes in Scripture and symbolizes here:  sin.  Sin essentially is our antagonism toward God—our contempt for Him, our desire to live independently of Him, our conceit that we are morally superior to Him.  This attitude has to be ruthlessly purged out because it separates us from the only source of life and thus results in death, both physical and spiritual.  When the word of God declares that “the wages of sin is death” (Rom.6:23), it is talking cause and effect.

Jesus was born in Bethlehem, the hometown of His ancestor David; its name means “house of bread.”  He said, “I am the bread of life.  He who comes to me will never go hungry, and he who believes in me will never be thirsty. ...  I am the living bread that came down from heaven.  If anyone eats of this bread he will live forever.  This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.” (John 6:35, 51)  Jesus Himself, since He is our Creator and Redeemer, is the only source of life there is.  He went on to hammer the point home:  “Jesus said to them, ‘I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.  Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.  For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink.  Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him.  Just as the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me.’” (John 6:53-57)

Because this issue is so critical, He brought it to the forefront again at the Last Supper.  Fulfilling the symbolism of the unleavened bread and the cups of wine in the Passover meal, “He took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to them, saying, ‘This is my body given for you; do this in remembrance of me.’  In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you.’” (Luke 22:19-20)  We notice an emphasis, which may seem even a morbid emphasis, on eating.  The lamb slain and roasted on that first Passover had to be eaten.  Centuries later the prophet Jeremiah declared, “When your words came, I ate them; they were my joy and my heart’s delight, for I bear your name, O Lord God Almighty.”(Jer.15:16)  And then the Word Himself came in the flesh and told us we must eat and drink Him.  What is this? It isn’t cannibalism, of course, it’s symbolism. But the symbolism of eating the bread and drinking the wine points to a potent spiritual reality.  Between us and God, through Christ, there is a benign mutual assimilation.  Unless we are in Christ by faith (personal trust) and He in us, we cannot share in His rich, pure, joyous everlasting life.  We are left in our unredeemed sin and its consequence, death.  We remain apart.

            Christ’s life for us and in us is pure because He is the unleavened bread.  He was and remains sinless.  He was “tempted in every way, just as we are—yet was without sin.”(Heb.4:15)  “Sinless” is a negative term, but its positive counterpart is sheer beauty:  Jesus is full of love, joy, peace, wisdom, goodness, gentleness, generosity, humility, faithfulness, justice and mercy.  Plus, He is King of kings and Lord of lords.  And because He is sinless, His body suffered no corruption while He lay in the tomb (see Acts 2:22-32).  He was as perfect in death as in life.  His perfection shone most gloriously when He was raised from the dead.


Firstfruits

That is what the third feast, the feast of Firstfruits, prefigures.  It commemorates the miraculous passage of the Israelites through the Red Sea, and it joins that event, on the calendar and in timeless meaning, with the resurrection of Christ.  On the day of Firstfruits the priest held up a sheaf of the “first fruits” of the spring grain harvest and waved it before the Lord, thanking Him in advance for the whole harvest.  Jesus fulfilled the spiritual promise of the Feast by being the first to be raised into an entirely new order of life.  He spoke of this prophetically when He taught that “a kernel of wheat must be planted in the soil.  Unless it dies, it will be alone—a single seed.  But its death will produce many new kernels—a plentiful harvest of new lives.” (John 12:24 NLT)  And as Paul later affirmed, “Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. ...  But each in his own turn:  Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him.” (1Cor.15:20, 23)  When else should Christ, the firstfuits of the eternal resurrection, be raised except on the feast of Firstfruits?  In being so raised, He inaugurated a radical transformation of human life.  We must understand that the spiritual body in which Christ was raised stands in relation to our mortal bodies in much the same way that those bodies stand in relation to their shadows on the floor and wall (see 1Cor.15:35-57).

The crossing of the Red Sea also prefigures the triumph of Christ over all the ravages of sin and death.  Immediately following the crossing comes the exultant Song of Moses:

Then Moses and the Israelites sang this song to the LORD: “I will sing to the LORD, for he is highly exalted. The horse and its rider he has hurled into the sea.
“The LORD is my strength and my song; he has become my salvation. He is my God, and I will praise him, my father’s God, and I will exalt him.
“The LORD is a warrior; the LORD is his name.  Pharaoh’s chariots and his army he has hurled into the sea. The best of Pharaoh’s officers are drowned in the Red Sea.  The deep waters have covered them; they sank to the depths like a stone.
“Your right hand, O LORD, was majestic in power. Your right hand, O LORD, shattered the enemy.  In the greatness of your majesty you threw down those who opposed you. You unleashed your burning anger; it consumed them like stubble.  By the blast of your nostrils the waters piled up. The surging waters stood firm like a wall; the deep waters congealed in the heart of the sea.
“The enemy boasted, ‘I will pursue, I will overtake them. I will divide the spoils; I will gorge myself on them. I will draw my sword and my hand will destroy them.’  But you blew with your breath, and the sea covered them. They sank like lead in the mighty waters.
“Who among the gods is like you, O LORD? Who is like you—majestic in holiness, awesome in glory, working wonders?  You stretched out your right hand and the earth swallowed them.
“In your unfailing love you will lead the people you have redeemed. In your strength you will guide them to your holy dwelling.
“The nations will hear and tremble; anguish will grip the people of Philistia.  The chiefs of Edom will be terrified, the leaders of Moab will be seized with trembling, the people of Canaan will melt away; terror and dread will fall upon them. By the power of your arm they will be as still as a stone—until your people pass by, O LORD, until the people you bought pass by.
“You will bring them in and plant them on the mountain of your inheritance—the place, O LORD, you made for your dwelling, the sanctuary, O Lord, your hands established.  The LORD will reign for ever and ever.” (Ex. 15:1-18)

This is the celebration of a mighty act of God, a miraculous deliverance from certain death, a divine victory over a malign and implacable enemy.  Redeemed by the love and power of their Lord, the Israelites emerged as a reborn nation, free to turn their efforts toward the conquest and occupation of the Promised Land.

Exactly this note of triumph is sounded in the New Testament in reporting and celebrating the resurrection of Christ.  Again and again in the book of Acts the apostles preached the good news: Through the collaboration of human and infernal malice Jesus was tortured to death on the cross, but God, having accepted that perfect sacrifice, has raised Him from the dead.  Jesus has defeated death itself, as Paul exults:

When the perishable has been clothed with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality, then the saying that is written will come true: “Death has been swallowed up in victory.”
“Where, O death, is your victory?  Where, O death, is your sting?”
The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law.  But thanks be to God!  He gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ. (1Cor.15:54-57)

From Genesis through Revelation, one of the Bible’s main themes is Satan’s obsession with trying to spoil God’s purpose in creating the human race.  It is questionable whether Satan is so self-deluded that he has ever seriously believed that he, a creature dependent for his ongoing existence on his Creator, can actually thwart the Creator’s plans.  Probably he has lied so incessantly, even to himself, that he has come to believe his lies.  Now, if the Creator were Himself in any way tainted with evil, then Satan’s rebellion, even though doomed to failure, might at least merit respect.  Since God is completely good, however, Satan’s rebellion must be regarded not only as absurd foolishness, in attempting to overcome omnipotence, but also as detestable evil.  Whatever increase of misery awaits Satan and his admirers is appropriate.

  The crucifixion of Christ was the apex of Satan’s schemes, and it was also his supreme delusion.  What he thought was his victory was, precisely, his defeat.  And the Resurrection is the glorious confirmation of Christ’s victory.  As Paul explains at length in 1Corinthians 15, Christ has become the “firstfruits” in the emergence of a new, incorruptible, indestructible life, a new people of God, seen in John’s vision as “a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language ....” (Rev.7:9)  The risen Lord, witnessed in person, tangibly, by His closest disciples along with hundreds of others, disproved by no one ever, is our guarantee that we who trust in Him will be together with Him in the great harvest at the end of this age.  That will be the day.

The destruction of Pharaoh’s army in the Red Sea also foreshadows the New Covenant in the theme of death by drowning.  The Song of Moses emphasizes this theme: “The LORD is a warrior; the LORD is his name.  Pharaoh’s chariots and his army he has hurled into the sea. The best of Pharaoh’s officers are drowned in the Red Sea.  The deep waters have covered them; they sank to the depths like a stone.”( Ex.15:3-4)  Our entrance into the New Covenant in Christ is signalled by the rite of baptism.  The New Testament Greek word baptizo means to submerge or immerse in water.  As Paul explains, the rite of baptism symbolizes the believer’s union with Christ specifically in His death and resurrection:

[D]on’t you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death?  We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life.  If we have been united with him like this in his death, we will certainly also be united with him in his resurrection. (Rom.6:3-5)

Our baptism into Christ was foreshadowed by the baptism of the Israelites into Moses:  “For I do not want you to be ignorant of the fact, brothers, that our forefathers were all under the cloud and that they all passed through the sea. They were all baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea.” (1Cor.10:1-2)

What is symbolized in baptism is more than pictorial, it is a real death for the believer, just as it was for Christ.  “I have been crucified with Christ,” Paul states, “and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me ....” (Gal.2:20)  And again, “Since, then, you have been raised with Christ, set your hearts on things above, where Christ is seated at the right hand of God.  Set your minds on things above, not on earthly things.  For you died, and your life is now hidden with Christ in God.”(Col.3:1-3)

Just what is this death which the believer dies when he or she is joined with Christ by trusting in Him?  It has been variously explained, but the best understanding is probably that, as a believer, I no longer have a self-life that is independent of Christ.  In that sense, He has become my life, and I have become a participant in the great truth that there is no genuine or complete life apart from Him.  When I sin—that is, when in thought or action I disobey Him—I am simply behaving as though I still had an independent life of my own.  I am being untrue to my truest self, as Paul expresses so dramatically in the second half of Romans 7.  The drowning symbolized in baptism is the drowning of everything in my life that is separate from Christ and alien to Him, everything that is selfish and corrupt and futile.

At the beginning of the Mosaic Covenant, the enemies of God’s people were drowned—defeated—and the people themselves were “baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea.”  They were consecrated to Moses’ leadership under the sovereignty of God (the cloud). The New Covenant completes, permanently, this attainment of life through death.  Through Christ’s sacrificial death and triumphant resurrection, Satan’s power over believers has been overthrown (Col.2:13-15, Heb.2:14-15, 1John 3:8), and we are delivered from a living death into an everlasting life that is completely worth living.


Pentecost

Compare these two descriptions of what occurred on the same day of the year about fifteen centuries apart:

On the morning of the third day there was thunder and lightning, with a thick cloud over the mountain, and a very loud trumpet blast. Everyone in the camp trembled.  Then Moses led the people out of the camp to meet with God, and they stood at the foot of the mountain.
Mount Sinai was covered with smoke, because the LORD descended on it in fire. The smoke billowed up from it like smoke from a furnace, the whole mountain trembled violently, and the sound of the trumpet grew louder and louder. Then Moses spoke and the voice of God answered him.  The LORD descended to the top of Mount Sinai and called Moses to the top of the mountain. So Moses went up. (Ex.19:16-20)

When the day of Pentecost came, they were all together in one place.  Suddenly a sound like the blowing of a violent wind came from heaven and filled the whole house where they were sitting.  They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them.  All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them. (Acts 2:1-4)

The physical similarities here are striking, but what really joins these two events together, beyond their occurring on the same calendar day, is their significance in the history of God’s relations with humanity.  On both occasions, God was sealing a covenant with His people, first the Old Covenant mediated by Moses, and then the New Covenant mediated by Christ.  The Old Covenant, inaugurated by the miraculous deliverance from slavery in Egypt, was sealed by the giving of the Law.  The New Covenant, inaugurated by the death and resurrection of Christ, was sealed by the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the gathered believers.  The Law bound the people of Israel together as the covenant people of God, and the Holy Spirit binds all followers of Jesus together as the body of Christ.  In Old Testament times the feast of Pentecost celebrated the fullness of the annual harvest (as Firstfruits celebrated its beginning), and with the outpouring of the Holy Spirit and the preaching of the gospel, the New Covenant harvest was in full swing.

In all these ways, God has used the Feasts to tie together His major works in the history of human salvation.  The Feasts join the Old and New Covenants on the calendar and also in their deep, rich significance.  “The LORD has done this, and it is marvelous in our eyes.” (Ps.118:23)


            Part III:  Should Christians Observe
                     the Feasts of the Lord?

Surprisingly, perhaps, there are good reasons why Christians at the start of the third millenium might choose to observe the Feasts of the Lord.  But one question naturally suggests itself at the outset.  Since we haven’t been keeping the feasts for around nineteen centuries, why should we start keeping them now?  This question, however, immediately raises another:  Are there good reasons why we haven’t been keeping the feasts all these centuries?

There are at least four reasons why we haven’t, and in this section I will examine how good they are.  First, nowhere in the New Testament are believers instructed to continue observing the Levitical feasts.  Second, Paul warned us to avoid legalistic observances.  Third, one influential view of the New Covenant in relation to the Old holds that the feasts have been rendered obsolete for Christians.  And fourth, early in church history, Easter was substituted for the primary Levitical feast of Passover, and the church evolved its own religious calendar.  I will consider in order each of these reasons for not keeping the feasts.


1. The Argument from Silence

In regard to the New Testament’s lack of instructions, the argument from silence cuts both ways.  It might mean that the believers were to discontinue the feasts, or it might be taking for granted (approvingly) that they were still keeping them.  And, in fact, the New Testament isn't entirely silent on the subject.  From Acts 21:17-26 it is clear that most Jewish converts were still keeping Torah—not in order to earn salvation or favor with God, but in order to honor their spiritual roots and maintain the connection with them.  The account in Acts indicates that Paul approved of this.  Also, some years earlier Paul had instructed the Corinthians:  “Get rid of the old yeast that you may be a new batch without yeast—as you really are.  For Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.  Therefore let us keep the Festival, not with the old yeast, the yeast of malice and wickedness, but with bread without yeast, the bread of sincerity and truth.” (1Cor.5:7-8)  Notice what this exhortation does and does not do.  Paul does not tell them to keep the feast of Passover/ Unleavened Bread but rather how to keep it, the proper spirit in which to keep it.  That they were in fact keeping it is assumed.  It is highly unlikely that “let us keep the Festival” is meant to be taken spiritually and not literally.  To any Jew, and surely to Paul, “keeping the feast” meant doing something very familiar and tangible.  This instruction is thus parallel to the longer teaching in chapter 11 where Paul admonishes the Corinthian believers about the proper manner and spirit in which to observe the Lord’s Supper.  In both cases their problem was not neglect but worldliness.

Significantly, here we find evidence that the largely Gentile church in Corinth was still keeping Passover a quarter century after Christ rose from the dead.

2. Legalistic Observances

The problem that both Jesus and Paul had with the Judaism of their day was that it was a legalistic perversion of the Old Covenant.  We need to keep clearly in mind the difference between law and legalism.  The law, being an expression of God’s loving will for His people, is good in itself and good for us.  We fall into legalism when we attempt to gain God’s favor (to “earn merit”) by keeping the law, by the “works” of the law.  Due to the sinfulness of the human heart, we cannot even come close to keeping God’s moral law perfectly—and perfection, of course, is the law’s demand.  As this impossibility became evident to legalistically inclined Jews under the Old Covenant, rather than seeking the Lord and trusting in His grace, they gradually devised an externalized form of the law, which we find exemplified in the Pharisees of Jesus’ day.  Paul claimed that, as a Pharisee, he had been legally blameless (Php.3:6).  Obviously he doesn’t mean that he had been blameless in regard to God’s law, but rather in regard to the externalized, ritualized code of the scribes and Pharisees.

   In Col.2:13-17, Paul warned his converts about being swayed by the arguments of those “Judaizers” who wanted to make such things as the Sabbath and the Feasts legally binding on all Christians:

When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins, having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross.  And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.
Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day.  These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ.

The pivotal clause here is “Therefore do not let anyone judge you ….”  Paul is emphasizing our freedom in Christ; in the New Covenant we are “not under law, but under grace.” (Rom.6:14)  God’s promise concerning the New Covenant was that “I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts.” (Jer.31:33)  This is the marvelous transforming power of the New Covenant: Through the power of Christ’s blood and the indwelling Holy Spirit, the law of God—His loving, holy direction for our lives—is written on our hearts, so that we can obey Him not out of legal obligation but out of our heart’s desire to please and bless Him.  In the New Covenant, the shadows have become the reality, and that reality is “full of grace and truth.” (John 1:14)  Therefore, as regards the Feasts of the Lord, if we become convinced, through Scripture and plain reasoning, that they are indeed God’s “appointed times” for us to celebrate our Messiah’s mighty works of salvation, then we are free to worship Him wholeheartedly in this way.  And if we are not so convinced, we are equally free to worship Him as our conscience leads (see Romans 14).   This is the freedom of the gospel.


3. The Covenant of Salvation

Our view of whether or not Christians ought to observe the Levitical feasts largely depends on our understanding of how the New Covenant is related to the Old.  Unfortunately, in my view, a lot of poor theology on this subject has generated a lot of misunderstanding.  The crux of the matter is whether, according to the Bible, there is continuity or discontinuity between the Old and New Covenants.  For the reasons I will put forward, I believe the relationship is definitely one of continuity.

First, there is the great covenant promise:  “I will be your God, and you will be my people.”  This promise is first made in connection with the covenant with Abraham (Gen.17:7) and is repeated again and again in both testaments (see, for example, Lev.26:12, Jer.7:23, 31:33, Ezek.36:28, Hos.2:23, Zech.8:8, Heb.8:10).  “My people” is singular:  There is one God and one people of God.

Second, the “new” in New Covenant (Jer.31:31) actually means “renewed” or “renovated.”  The same Hebrew word (chadash) was used for the rebuilding of Jerusalem and the temple (2Chron.24:4).  So the New Covenant is the Old Covenant radically renewed, the imperfect made perfect in the Messiah.  The Abrahamic covenant, the Mosaic covenant, the Davidic covenant, and the covenant in Jesus’ blood are all phases in the great covenant of salvation between God and His people.  The covenant with Abraham has never been revoked (Gal.3:17), it has just been enhanced.  The Lord delivered His people out of slavery in Egypt, preparing them to receive His commandments through Moses, because He was mindful of His existing covenant relationship with them (Ex.2:23-25).  The olive tree in Rom.11:16-24 represents the faithful people of God throughout history, from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (the root), to the faithful Jewish remnant (Isa.1:9;10:20-23, Rom.11:1-6), to the believing Gentiles who are grafted in, to the Jews who in future time will believe in their Messiah and be grafted back in.  There is one God and one people of God.

Third, God’s covenant relationship with His people began when Abraham received the promise by faith (Gen.15:6, Rom.4), and it has been sustained by faith ever since.  Moses was a man of faith, and the covenant that he mediated between the Lord and His people was a covenant of faith.  Hebrews 11, of course, is eloquent testimony to this, and it concludes with the affirmation of God’s purpose that the Old Testament saints “should not be made perfect apart from us”—or “only together with us,” as the NIV puts it, ironing out the double negative.  There is one people of God, and they are a people of faith.

Fourth, God’s covenant relationship with His people is and has always been an expression of His grace, empowered by His grace.  John’s statement that “the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ” (John 1:17) has been widely misunderstood to mean that God’s law is somehow a bad thing and that the Old Covenant was devoid of grace, if not truth.  It cannot be overemphasized that the law is a good thing.  In truth it is, as David said, more precious than gold and sweeter than honey (Psalm 19:10), and as Paul said, it is “holy, righteous, and good.” (Rom.7:12)  The real culprit is sin, which the law rightly judges and condemns.  Moreover, God’s deliverance of the Hebrews out of slavery in Egypt and into the Promised Land is the foremost manifestation of His grace towards His people prior to the incarnation of Christ. The book of Deuteronomy, explaining the significance of the Exodus experience, resonates with eloquent expressions of the Lord’s gracious love and mercy.

The difference between the Old and New Covenants in regard to God’s grace is that prior to the Messiah’s coming, divine grace was mainly manifested in ways external to the human heart.  The Exodus delivered the people politically and formed the nation as a whole, but, except for a chosen remnant whom the Lord sovereignly regenerated, the Israelites still had little inner resistance to idolatry, unbelief, and sin in general.  As Paul explains in Galatians, the law was given as an interim measure, a tutor/governor for a people still in spiritual childhood (3:24).  It was a necessary measure, a discipline provided by a loving Father (Prov.3:11-12, Heb.12:5-11) and a way of showing unequivocally the need for spiritual salvation.  The law itself, however, never could bring salvation and was never intended to.

Inasmuch as God’s grace had been manifested mainly in external ways, it is easy to understand why the Jews were tempted to regard His law as a matter of externals—but still it was wrong, and they had received sufficient revelation to know better.  The first and greatest commandment was to love the Lord with all your heart (Deut.6:5).  The prophets realized this truth and tried to impart it to the nation, but without success.  A much greater work of God was needed, the work described in the Gospels.  Jesus came not to abolish the law but to fulfill it (Matt.5:17).  He was “the telos of the law” (Rom.10:4), where telos means “end, completion, fulfillment.”  He ended the dispensation of law by fulfilling the law in His own person.  Love is the fulfillment of the law (Rom.13:10), and Jesus is full and perfect love.  He kept the moral law perfectly, completely, even to the laying down of His life—His primary covenant purpose—and in so doing He revealed the true spirit of the law, which is the heart of God.  He redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us (Gal.3:10-13), and thereby He made the grace of God inward and personal for us.  To be under the law is to bear an insupportable weight, but to have the law written on your heart (Jer.31:33), through the regenerative power of the New Covenant in Christ’s blood, is a miraculous blessing.

Under both the Old and New Covenant, our part is to obey the revealed will of God, and we do so by grace, through faith.  We have greater grace under the New Covenant, thanks to the incarnation, crucifixion, and resurrection of Jesus Christ and the outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost.  The messianic events that the Old Testament saints could only look forward to hopefully, we can look back on with full assurance.  By God’s eternal design, the Old Covenant systematically foreshadowed, pointed to, and prepared the way for the New.  And among the main pointers were the Feasts of the Lord.


4. Two Calamitous Rejections

In the early church, quite naturally, there were controversies over which elements of the Old Covenant were permanent, assimilated into the New, and which had been made obsolete.  The council at Jerusalem in Acts 15 is one instance of this ongoing discussion.  Some things, like animal sacrifices in the temple, were soon understood to be obsolete (Heb.10:1-18).  Other things, like circumcision, were a more difficult call, but the Jerusalem council determined that it should not be required for Gentile believers.  And still other things, like the moral law summarized in the Ten Commandments, were clearly still in effect under the New Covenant—even more deeply in effect since the law is now written on the believers’ hearts. With regard to the Feasts of the Lord, inasmuch as God’s people are commanded to observe them “throughout your generations as a permanent ordinance” (Ex.12:17 NAS), their continued observance under the New Covenant seems, in the end, a matter of simple obedience.

As time went on, though, partly as a result of the series of Roman wars against Jewish rebellions, and partly due to theological differences over the divinity of Christ and the nature of the Godhead, the predominantly Gentile church came to identify itself more as separate and distinct from the Old Testament people of God than as their descendants in a continuous covenant relationship with the Holy One of Israel.  The sad historical fact is that the most vicious and persistent persecution of the Jews has come at the hands of predominantly Christian societies.

Behind this shame loom two calamitous rejections.  First, the Jews rejected their Messiah, with the prophesied consequence (Luke 21:20-24) that Jerusalem was besieged and destroyed by the Romans and the survivors sent into slavery and exile.  Second, partly in reaction to the Jews’ rejection of Jesus, during the first few centuries A.D. the Christians increasingly rejected their Old Covenant roots and sank into anti-Semitism.  By the fourth century, when the bishops decided to separate Easter from Passover, a virulent strain of anti-Semitism had taken root in Christian thought—they remembered that the Jewish leaders engineered Christ’s crucifixion and forgot that Christ was a Jew.  The pivotal Council of Nicea in 325 prohibited Jewish believers from circumcising their children (a radical switch from the Council of Jerusalem!) and from observing the Feasts of the Lord. “The Jewish believers were forced to cease being Jewish and to become, in every sense of the word, Gentiles.” (Joseph Good, Rosh Hashana, viii)  Christ tore down the dividing wall of hostility between Jews and Gentiles (Eph.2:14), and the Christians, egged on by the Jews, built it back up.

Thus the church descended into “a specifically Christian branch of anti-Semitism which was superimposed on and blended with the ancient … pagan anti-Semitic tradition to form in time a mighty engine of hatred.” (Paul Johnson, A History of the Jews, 146)  With a few shining exceptions, the subsequent history of Jewry in Europe is mostly a long dreadful litany of discrimination, oppression, ghettoization, expulsion, and massacre. The Holocaust, horrible as it was, was not an anomaly but a culmination.

This long, stiff-necked estrangement between Christians and Jews has produced a major historical irony.  The Jews have kept the Feasts all these centuries without understanding their real significance.  Meanwhile the Christians, who do understand that Jesus is the Messiah, rather than keeping the Lord’s “appointed times” for celebrating the Messiah’s mighty deeds of salvation, have brushed off the Lord’s appointments and substituted a religious calendar derived from paganism—Lent, Easter, Christmas.  Easter was taken over from the old Germanic festival of Eastre, a goddess of spring and fertility who in turn probably derives from Ishtar, the ancient Babylonian goddess of fertility and war.  Christmas is a baptized version of the Roman Saturnalia festival; it was eventually swamped by folklore and is now mainly commercial.  Like the Pharisees, we have “let go of the commands of God and are holding on to the traditions of men.” (Mark 7:8)

A day of reckoning is coming for both Jews and Christians, which I believe will be the fulfillment of the Jewish season of Teshuvah (“return, repentance”).   Beginning on Elul 1 and concluding forty days later on Tishri 10, which is Yom Kippur (the Day of Atonement), Teshuvah calls us to repent before the Day of the Lord—Judgment Day—comes. When Teshuvah is fulfilled, the judicial blinding of the Jews (Rom.11:7-9, 25) will be lifted, and the Jewish people, individually and en masse, will recognize that the crucified Nazarene is the true Messiah and will repent for having rejected Him.  As Jesus prophesied through Zechariah, “And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication.  They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child, and grieve bitterly for him as one grieves for a firstborn son.” (Zech.12:10)

Meanwhile the church, as individual believers and as a whole body, will experience its own Teshuvah.  Broadly speaking, we do not understand real repentance because we have not experienced it.  The church, particularly in America, is immersed in a wealthy, materialistic, self-centered, and in-creasingly pagan society.  Too often we have either gone with the flow and become indistinguishable from them, or else reacted by becoming smugly self-righteous, or even (notably on TV) done both at once.  God calls us to be unified in Christ, but mostly we are fragmented into mutual suspicion, disapproval, competition, and ignorance of one another. The church is alienated from itself almost as much as from its Judaic roots.  But the Lord has a cure for our malady:  Teshuvah, a God-empowered ordeal of repen-tance on a scale and to a depth commensurate with that of the Jews.  As they grieve for having rejected Jesus, so we will grieve for having despised and persecuted them, for cutting ourselves off from our Biblical roots and insulting our gracious Lord.  As one grieves for a firstborn son.


That is how the church will finally reach spiritual maturity. Paul prophesied that Christ would work within His church “until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ.” (Eph.4:13)  From where we are at now, it will require the shock therapy of a Teshuvah repentance to achieve that level of maturity.  The result, however, will fulfill the promise of the Day of Atonement and will be an event unparalleled in human history: Jews and Christians reconciled with God and with one another in a massive outpouring of forgiveness and joy.  Paul describes it in these terms (speaking of God’s rejection of the Jews on account of their rejection of Christ):  “For if their rejection is the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead?” (Rom.11:15) The colossal exultation of this great reconciliation will be like a megaton spiritual explosion sending wave upon wave of powerful witness throughout the world, witness to the truth that Jesus is indeed the Savior of the world.  This will occur during the seven-year Tribulation period, when the Antichrist is consolidating his totalitarian regime and doing everything in his power to defeat the kingdom of God through propaganda and persecution.  Many of God’s people will be martyred (Rev.6:9-11), but our reconciliation will seal the doom of Antichrist.  Those of us who are still alive at that time will overcome him by the blood of the Lamb, by the word of our testimony, and by our willingness to die in upholding the name of Jesus (Rev.12:11).  The Messiah’s second coming, announced with a supernatural trumpet blast (Matt.24:30-31, 1Thess.4:16-17, Rev.19:11-21), will destroy the Antichrist and all his works, and will inaugurate the Messianic reign in fulfillment of the feast of Tabernacles.


Conclusion

The Exodus events—in particular, the Passover, crossing the Red Sea, and the giving of the Law on Mt. Sinai—were “a type and shadow” of their New Covenant fulfillment in Christ. The Lord established the seven Feasts as the way we are to celebrate this connection.  They are the means that God has provided for us and the appointed times that God has provided for us to celebrate His great acts of salvation on our behalf.  How remarkably appropriate it is that Christ, the “firstfruits” of the general resurrection (see 1Cor.15:23), should have been resurrected on the very day—the feast of Firstfruits—that commemorates the miraculous deliverance from death to life when the Red Sea was parted.

As historical markers, the Feasts of the Lord (the first four at least) are utterly unparalleled in that they point both ways, commemoratively back to the Exodus and prophetically forward to Christ—and with a degree of precision over the span of many centuries which could only have been achieved by the hand of God.  The Feasts, rightly understood and faithfully observed, reveal to us both our true roots in salvation history and our true destiny as the people of God.  If we, the people of the New Covenant, were “keeping the feasts” as Paul exhorted us to do, we would be celebrating this inviolable, God-ordained connection between past, present, and future.  We would be celebrating the certainty that God has fulfilled His covenant promises foreshadowed by Passover, Unleavened Bread, Firstfruits, and Pentecost, and that He will fulfill His covenant promises heralded in the feasts of Trumpets, Yom Kippur, and Tabernacles.





Monday, February 21, 2011

Two Poems

        SEEING

   (Mark 8:24, John 9:25)

Jesus touched a blind man,
blinking now he sees;
all those voices in the night
tower about like trees.

Daylight hammers on a heart
used to restless sleep,
reveals his feet against a slope
shimmering and steep.

Who will bear the weight now
shown unbearable?
Who will heal his wakened heart
aching to be whole?

He that touched the eyes
bears a wounded tree.
“All I know is this, that I
was blind, and now I see.”



              But God

A curse, and the woven bramble
they wrenched on Jesus’ brow
to jeers from guts gone cold.
But God laughed last:
he turned those writhing thorns into
a crown of gold.

Down his face in trickles,
like lava down his chest
oozed the holy human blood.
But God gave more:
out of those pitiful streams he made
a worldround flood.

Racked on the ax-scarred tree
my Savior hung and loved
through agony of bone.
But God raised stakes:
he took the blood-kissed wood of the cross
and built a throne.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

The Emperor's Newest Clothes

by Jeff Treder


Physicist Freeman Dyson has pointed out that there are two kinds of scientific revolutions, those driven by new concepts and those driven by new technologies.  A prime example of the former is Einstein’s relativity theories, which arose out of a new way of conceptualizing already existing empirical knowledge.  The latter is exemplified by the Copernican revolution, sparked by Copernicus and carried through by Galileo, Kepler and others, which was driven by the new technology of the telescope.  The “optic glass” made it possible, over the course of a century or so, to determine empirically that the planets orbit the sun and that their orbits are elliptical.  This revolution was resisted by Catholic church officials who thought (I think needlessly) that they had a theological vested interest in the Ptolemaic system, and who resorted to censorship and intimidation in a vain attempt to stem the tide.

We are currently in the early stages of a technology-driven scientific revolution which, I think, closely parallels the Copernican revolution.  This is the Intelligent Design (ID) movement in biology.  While the Copernican revolution resulted from a new ability to see out among the heavens, ID has been the result of a new ability to see into the workings of organic life at its most basic level.  The Copernican revolution showed that the long-reigning Ptolemaic model of the solar system and the universe was inaccurate, and now ID is showing that the long-reigning Darwinian—and more lately neo-Darwinian—theory of biological origins and development is largely inaccurate, resting on impossible foundations.  The reaction of the Darwinian establishment to the ID movement, so far, has been strikingly similar to the Catholic church’s reaction four centuries ago.

Darwin, given the level of biological knowledge available to him, made the not unreasonable assumptions that life must have evolved from very simple forms to the very complex forms we are familiar with, and that it must have done so through a long process of innumerable tiny changes.  What was new in Darwin was not the idea of biological evolution itself, which had been around since ancient times, but a plausible theory concerning the mechanism by which evolution actually happens.  The enthusiasm with which Darwin’s theory was accepted was in direct proportion to how eager people were to find a naturalistic alternative to the long-reigning paradigm of the divine, supernatural creation of the universe, biological life, and human life.

Over the last half century, molecular biochemists have discovered that even the simplest unicellular life forms are fantastically complex, far more complex in structure and efficient in operation than anything humans have designed and built.  This great complexity and efficiency are necessary for life to survive at any level.

The time span available for life to have randomly organized on Earth is the window between when the planet cooled enough to support complex organic molecules (about 3.9 billion years ago) and when there is fossil evidence for the earliest bacteria (about 3 billion years ago). However, many scientists have shown that for the first—extremely complex—life forms to have assembled by random chance in less than a billion years is statistically impossible—that is, a chance of less than one in ten to the fiftieth power. The scientists studying this evidence and making the calculations are of various religious views; religion doesn’t affect the math.

Just as the telescope revealed a universe very different indeed from the concentric cathedral in which medieval people thought they lived, so different is the amazingly intricate and ingenious mini-factory that is the biological cell from the simple, homogeneous blob of “protoplasm” that the Darwinians expected (expected because the theory requires simple beginnings).  Darwin cannot be faulted for assuming that the first life forms were structurally simple, but on this point his theory is no longer tenable.

Nanotechnology engineers are now trying to copy the designs (what else could they call them?) of various molecular machines within the cell, hoping to fabricate tiny machines that may remotely approach the efficiency of what nature has produced.  Exactly how nature has produced them is something between an open question and a mystery.  Francis Crick, co-discoverer of the structure of DNA, warned biologists that they “must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved.” Intentionally or not, he wrongly slipped in the word “evolved,” since Darwinian evolution can only apply where biological reproduction is already up and running.  The first cell (or cells) could not have evolved through natural selection; they either came together by random chance or they were formed by a formidable designer.  But random chance, in this singularly momentous case, is mathematically nil.

DNA, the famous double helix which is the “brain” of every cell, is in fact a minute but very powerful computer, storing and processing vast amounts of information.  It controls all the cell’s activities, and it operates much faster than any human-built computer.  Scientists are now recognizing, belatedly perhaps, that information is not a function of physical matter/energy but exists in a separate domain and is a function of intelligence.  As ID theorists point out, the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) is based on this distinction.  As SETI astronomers monitor radio signals coming from various parts of the galaxy and beyond, they try to detect patterns in those signals that might indicate an intelligent, as opposed to purely natural, source (the movie “Contact” dramatizes this search).  The radio waves are the medium, but only an intelligent source could modulate those waves in such a way as to send a message.  Thus intelligence, while it is not a function of matter/energy, can nevertheless be detected empirically.  In daily life we do this all the time as a matter of course (which is why we don’t generally notice what we are doing).  In DNA, as on a larger scale in the human brain, information caused by intelligence is intrinsically bound up with the physical domain in the warp and woof of organic chemistry.

The source of this information and this intelligence is of course a momentous question.  In an attempt to keep supernatural explanations off the table, some scientists who are committed to a materialist philosophy have suggested that matter may have inherent self-organizing properties.  But this is simply an appeal to naturalistic miracle:  information-rich organic life just spontaneously created itself.  With divine miracles, at least you have a cause sufficient to the effect; with naturalistic miracles, you have effects with no cause at all.

While the assumption that life forms evolved gradually was necessary to Darwin’s theory, he was aware that the fossil record, insofar as it was known in his day, did not appear to support such gradualism.  His hopeful expectation was that future fossil research would reveal many of the in-between life forms.  A century and a half and multitudinous fossil finds later, however, that hope still goes unfulfilled.  The record still shows periods in which life forms with distinct body plans appear rapidly (in geologic time scales) followed by long periods of stasis or minor in-species change.  The record also includes a number of catastrophic extinction events.  Trying to keep Darwinian theory consistent with the fossil record, some evolutionary scientists like Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge have proposed that evolution proceeds by fits and starts.  The trouble with this idea is that the fits—bursts of rapid evolutionary change—strain statistical credibility to the point where, again, we are asked to believe in a long series of naturalistic miracles.

Like the Catholic church around the turn of the seventeenth century, the Darwinian establishment is not pleased by what new technologies have discovered.  This current establishment also sees itself with a huge vested interest in the old paradigm.  Unable to explain the new discoveries plausibly by means of Darwin’s theory, his followers, like the Curia of old, have resorted to censorship and intimidation.  Intelligent Design can’t be taken into consideration, they say, because it’s really just religion tricked out in scientific terms.  This charge is wearing thin, however.  Biochemistry isn’t religion.  ID has religious implications, certainly, but so does Darwinism or any other theory that sets out to explain the origin and development of life, all the way up to human beings.  ID theorists cite empirical evidence, not biblical texts.  This is precisely the reason why Darwinists are reacting with alarm, even stooping to ad hominem aspersions like Richard Dawkins’ claim that anyone who doubts evolution is either ignorant, stupid, insane, or wicked.

In Andersen’s classic tale “The Emperor’s New Clothes,” the con is that only a fool can fail to see the sumptuous new garments.  Everyone goes along with the con until a child, not burdened by adult anxieties, shouts out that the old guy is really just stark naked.  At the present time, the Intelligent Design movement is a fresh voice pointing out that the scientific establishment is severely underdressed.

Monday, February 7, 2011

What Went Wrong: A Brief History of the Troubles

(This entry is a "speculative history" that runs to nearly sixty pages.  Please pay attention to the "Author's Note" below, a succinct and very good explanation of what it is.)


Author’s Note

What Went Wrong is a speculative history of the next twenty years, written both as an extrapolation of current history and as an interpretation of Biblical prophecy concerning events leading up to the second coming of Jesus Christ.  My goal is find a way—speculative, of necessity, but plausible and realistic—by which these two quite distinct viewpoints might be reconciled.  Just how are we going to get from here to there?  How will contemporary history merge with Biblical prophecy?  Most recent Christian end-times literature may be good fiction and more or less true to what the Bible says, but it seldom relates recognizably to the world we currently live in.

In placing all these events in the next twenty years I may be telescoping the time-line, which God alone knows.  The Great Tribulation may be somewhat further in the future.  But the causal connections are sound.  If we believe that Biblical prophecy has verifiably been fulfilled in the past and will be fulfilled in the future, then the Tribulation is coming, in real-time history, and it will emerge seamlessly from the world events we now experience.

What Went Wrong is not predictive prophecy but is offered as a reasonable scenario.  The supposed author is a historian writing, anonymously and clandestinely, in 2031.  “May you live in interesting times.”  He does (will?), and so do we.


Primary Biblical texts:  Psalm 2, Isa.9:1-7, Ezek.37-39, Dan.7-12, Joel 3, Amos 9, Micah 4-5,   Zech.12-14, Matt. 13, 24, 28:18-20, Mark 13, Luke 21, John 15, Acts 1:8, Rom.11, 1Thess.4:13-18, 2Thess.2:1-12, 2Tim.3:1-5, Rev.6-7, 11-13, 17-18.






What Went Wrong:  A Brief History of the Troubles


Foreword

The clock is striking thirteen.

When I began this history fourteen months ago, I expressed a doubt about how many readers it would ever find.  Now, as 2031 opens in darkness, I have much more reason to fear there will not be many.  The Authority is everywhere, and time is not on our side. I am now sending this document throughout our network, as securely as possible (security being only a memory). At this point I can only express my deep gratitude to those who risk everything for the sake of freedom—above all, the freedom to know and speak the truth.  Or, at least, to record it.  History ought to be recorded even if there is no one able or willing to read it.

My wife (whose name, like my own, I will keep to myself) has been conscripted into one of the Local Watch units, made up of civilians ordered to spy on their neighbors (and family members) and report all incorrect speech or behavior.  She will do the best—that is, the least—she can for as long as she can.  Our two sons have been out of touch for many months now, ever since they were drafted into the organs of the Authority.  They may be dead by now, or they might be better off dead.  One grows numb to things which, in another life, would have horrified us.  In every city, in every street and alley, disease, starvation and the Special Police are our close companions.

Strangely, I do find myself regretting the loss of those “fanatical arrogant haters,” the Christians and Jews—or those millions (billions?) of them that are missing.  Whether they were sucked up by the Authority and secretly exterminated, or sucked up by their God as some people say, I don’t know.  One measure of how weird things have become is that either explanation seems equally unbelievable, yet there is no other.  At least they had the nerve to reject what anyone who values his neck praises as being above and beyond all criticism.  The Leader has been vague on their disappearance, saying only that they got what they deserved.  “On behalf of the People we tirelessly devote ourself to the elimination of selfish and treasonous elements.”

By whatever fate or fortune remains to us, I have survived to finish this accounting, down to the present.  And you, good reader, have begun it.  I hope you will live to finish it.



Chapter 1:  Where Did It Begin?

The past is over and done with.”  The Leader, interview, 2019


I don’t know how many people, if any, will ever read this history.  I have decided to write it nevertheless, come what may, because the truth always needs to be told.  The first question that must be asked and answered is:  At what point, and out of what causes, did the Troubles emerge?  One might, of course, trace it all the way back to the first early human who picked up a rock and brained one of his fellows, but a narrower focus would be more to the point. The general calamity in which we now live—or exist—was gathering steam and building to a crisis during the 1990’s.  It seems possible to identify three major causes, which interacted with one another in complicated ways. These three are fossil fuel overuse, climate change, and a global financial system grown beyond any control.


A Fountain of Energy

I will start with the fossil fuel problem.  The massive extraction and burning of fossil fuels began with coal in the nineteenth century, followed by oil, a more concentrated energy source, in the twentieth century.  This sustained fountain of energy supported several technological revolutions and enabled the human population to explode, from around one billion in 1800 to seven billion by 2015.  A predominantly rural, agricultural civilization became an urban, industrial civilization and then a mega-urban, technocratic civilization. Countries that had been backward until recently—notably China—suddenly became the leaders of global economic growth and the largest consumers of oil, coal, timber, wheat, iron, copper, and so forth. All this transformation faced only two limits, but those two limits were absolute: the planet’s ability to support endless economic growth, and its supply of oil. The population, expanding both numerically and economically, came up against both limits at about the same time, during the second decade of the twenty-first century.

This sustained growth had collateral effects. Many basic natural resources besides oil were depleted or damaged, especially fresh water and forests.  Much of the natural environment was polluted by noxious emissions and industrial and domestic garbage. This pollution was more than an aesthetic problem; it aggravated many public health crises and inflamed social discontent. The reigning economic model, however, demanded continuous growth as the basis of social well-being. It demanded growth, but the planet could no longer support it.  Offshore drilling got into ever deeper and wilder waters.  Tar sands were mined, turning northern forests into sulfurous wastelands. In spite of all this, global oil supplies could no longer keep up with demand.  Political instability in the Middle East, Nigeria and Venezuela made things worse. Sporadic terrorist attacks against vulnerable production and transport facilities made things worse still. Oil and gasoline prices ratcheted upward, pulling other prices up with them.

During the 20-teens there were hopes that alternative, renewable energy sources would be able to replace most fossil-fuel energy. Wind, solar, and geothermal energy were widely developed and deployed, but they never became productive or cost-effective enough to be more than minor players. Several more decades for development might have made a difference, but we will never know now.

This accelerating growth in population, industry and energy consumption had another major side effect.  Billions of tons of “greenhouse gases” were released into the earth’s atmosphere, causing the planet’s mean temperature to rise.  The rise was slow in comparison with the rate at which we live our daily life, but fast for the planet’s rhythm of life.  Within a few decades—an earth eyeblink—the Arctic ice retreated, glaciers everywhere were melting, huge chunks of the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets broke off and slid into the ocean, hurricanes and river flooding intensified, deserts advanced, rainforests dried out and burned, and monsoon rain patterns shifted.  The effects of these changes on human life seemed minor at first, but by 2015 they were alarming and by 2025 they became catastrophic.



Toward the Icebergs

The third major cause of our Troubles, an out-of-control financial system, is also closely linked with our industrial and technological growth.  Simply put, economic growth both produces and depends on financial growth. Businesses and industries produce wealth; banks store and invest that wealth; investments increase the banks’ wealth, and they then loan out some of that increase to finance new businesses.  This symbiotic relationship has been going on for four or five centuries.  In the economic boom since the end of World War II, however, and especially since around 1990, the large investment banks—Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, J.P.Morgan Chase, Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, and so on—garnered the greatest wealth and became indispensable to businesses, industries, and governments alike.  They became “too big to fail,” which meant they became essentially autonomous.  In their quest for profits, playing the risk/reward game, they could make high-risk gambles, knowing that if they lost, sovereign governments would be forced to bail them out with taxpayers’ money, because otherwise the whole Titanic would go under. For the bankers it was win/win, all the way to the point at which everyone went bust.

These three things, then—fossil fuel consumption, climate change, and the financial system—were the main things pushing the ship toward the icebergs.  They weren’t the only things, though. There was also the lucrative (billions of dollars) international trade in military weaponry—guns, missiles, chemical explosives, land mines, and various high-tech weapons.  Not that the weapons caused the fights; tribes have been fighting each other ever since there were only two of them.  But assault rifles kill more efficiently than knives and spears, thereby arousing a lot more anger, hatred, and desire for vengeance—and for more lethal weapons.  Nations (we fooled ourselves about this) are mostly tribal amalgams.  The United Nations were never going to do much more than finger-pointing.  Civilization (open borders, trade of goods and ideas, Human Rights) is a veneer that erodes when we are attacked.

The worst weapons, of course, were the nuclear ones.  The threat of Mutually Assured Destruction (with its perfect acronym) kept the world safe, or at least deterred nuclear annihilation, for a remarkably long time—over seventy years. America and Russia reduced their arsenals, but the genie was long since out of the bottle. Nukes proliferated, and it really was only a matter of time and circumstance.



Boom and Bust

The first clear milestone on the descent to the Troubles was the economic boom and bust during the first decade of the new millenium.  (I am discounting the rise of China, Russia’s travails after the Soviet Union fell, and 9/11 and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan because, in hindsight, they were relatively less decisive.) The Great Recession that began in 2008 was correctly seen at the time as the worst blow to the world economy since the Great Depression.  The collapse began in the financial industry, which had come to dominate Western economies. Central to the exponential growth of finance was the ever expanding use of what economists call leverage, which simply means making bets—gambling—with borrowed money:  other people’s money.  Greed is normal in finance, but Wall Street players added wholesale swindling to their greed. The American mortgage industry, in particular, was riddled with fraud and conflict of interest, most of which was actually legal at the time.  It was the old story of the rich and powerful finding new ways to fleece the poor.  The mortgage bubble was in fact an enormous Ponzi scheme, a house of cards, and it fell apart in 2007.

The advanced economies were hit the hardest and longest by the ensuing recession. Excessive debt—federal, state, municipal and private—along with lingering high unemployment and the corrupted mortgage industry kept the United States in near-zero growth for five or six years.  This stagnation slid into a period of “stagflation” in 2014-16.  The combination of mammoth debt and “quantitative easing” (printing money to stimulate the economy) brought on inflation rates of 10-20% even without much economic growth. Ever since the recession began, successive administrations and congresses blustered about the urgency of reducing the federal deficit, and thus eventually the federal debt, before the whole economy was crushed under the weight.  But the political parties were too polarized to agree on any meaningful plan.  Compromise with the adversary was anathema, so most politicians devoted their energy to figuring out how to fling blame for the debacle across the aisle and avoid getting hit by it.

The U.S. dollar had been the global reserve currency for the better part of a century, but the dubious outlook for the American economy made investors leery, and they began (or continued) fleeing the dollar.  No other currency—the euro, the yen, the yuan—looked any more secure, so they swung back toward precious metals.  No one wanted to be pegged to the price of gold again, however, and there was no agreement on how to structure a “basket” of currencies as a global reserve.  Things muddled on inconclusively.

Growing Pains

The European Union, meanwhile, underwent its own stresses and strains.  Its member states, historically and currently, had considerably less in common with one another than New York, Florida, Texas and California had.  After months of rancorous labor strikes in Greece against government belt-tightening, while the government itself floundered ineffectually, the long-dreaded default on sovereign debt finally occurred in March, 2013.  The debate within the E.U. leadership over how to handle the crisis was equally rancorous.  When they decided in May of that year to cut Greece loose from the Union, the episode was compared with the Bush administration’s 2008 decision to let the investment bank Lehman Brothers fail.  In the consequence, the E.U. came within a hair of breaking up altogether and the euro barely survived as a common currency.

Japan, at this period, having endured its own economic doldrums and governmental incompetence for a quarter century, reverted toward ultra-nationalism.  Its public rhetoric became more strident than at any time since the 1930’s.  The government increased its long-standing protection of Japanese industry.  Military spending doubled between 2013 and 2015.  Relations with the U.S. were strained and with China were, verbally at least, belligerent.

And China responded in kind.  As it had been doing ever since the epochal turn toward capitalism under Deng Xiaoping, the Communist regime strove to manage and contain severe pressures within the giant country. The Party leaders were experts at riding the tiger, but the tiger kept getting bigger and more agitated.  Great wealth was created in the coastal cities, but it was concentrated in a few well-connected clans along with the Party bureaucracy.  Half of the fourteen hundred million people (as of 2014) still lived in rural or urban poverty.  Despite brutal government suppression, Buddhists in Tibet and Muslims in the northwest province of Xinjiang kept up their struggle for independence.  Heavy pollution made urban air unbreathable, while river and coastal pollution killed the fish. Water was scarce on the dry northern plain, and overworked farmlands were lost to erosion.  The Party could maintain its legitimacy and its hold on power only as long as the economy kept on growing at rates approaching 10% per year. Both domestic problems and the long recession among the advanced economies (China’s main customers) darkened the Party’s prospects, and so, like their Japanese antagonists, they sought to rally the populace with jingoistic rhetoric and hard-fisted international relations.

If China’s economy was growing at “only” 6 to 7% per year, that growth, along with 10% annual growth in India, was enough to stress the world’s supply of basic commodities, such as oil, copper, tin, zinc, wheat, and timber.  It was hard for people in the West at that time to conceive the magnitude of what had been going on in the developing world for two decades.  The arithmetic is simple, though.  The poorer half of the world’s population, who formerly had consumed negligible amounts of those commodities, were now consuming a lot, and more all the time.  Prices kept rising, and the supply could not be increased indefinitely.

The Middle East, as ever, had its own problems.  As the Iraq War (2003-10) wound down with the withdrawal of most U.S. forces, Iraq slid into low-grade, chaotic civil war.  The country, carved out of the defunct Ottoman Empire by Britain and France after World War I, never made much sense, being a forced coalition of Sunni Arabs, Shia Arabs, and Kurds. With Saddam gone, with unity no longer enforced by totalitarian power, Iraq went the same way Yugoslavia had gone twenty years before.

In the same neighborhood, the conflict between Israelis and Palestinian Arabs, which had been simmering and seething for almost a century, went into one of its periodic simmering phases.  In April, 2012, in a deal brokered as usual by the Americans, Israel and the Palestinian Authority reached a limited accord.  Israel ceded some more territory and (what sealed the deal) granted more water rights, while the P.A., having secured a rather tentative agreement with Hamas, promised to rein in the insurrection.  Most observers remained skeptical about the longer-term prospects.

America’s war in Afghanistan against the Taliban and an assortment of other Islamist mafias fared no better than the Iraq war had.  A counterinsurgency “surge” in 2010-11, having been presented as a final, make or break effort, fulfilled the expectations of most outsiders.  Local guerilla forces ruled by local mafias can always outlast foreign occupiers, especially when the locale is Afghanistan. By the summer of 2012, in the midst of a bitter presidential election campaign, both major parties realized that political support in America for the war effort had completely evaporated.  The U.S. continued irritating the Taliban with special forces operations and drone attacks, but the main effect of these was to energize Islamic fundamentalists.  The “war on terror,” if not lost, was certainly not won.

In January, 2013, a magnitude 7.5 earthquake destroyed most of Kathmandu, Nepal, along with many surrounding villages, killing over 80,000 people and injuring even more.  Since that disaster, the city has been only partially rebuilt and has a third fewer people than before.






Chapter 2:  Gathering Storms, 2013-15

Most nations and national leaders are only looking to their own interests. Corporations are the same.  What concerns me is the interest of humanity.” The Leader, addressing  the United Nations, 2021.


Those events, as I have said, marked the beginning of the Troubles.  In hindsight it is evident that what came later involved complicated cascading and multiplying effects.  The domino theory as a metaphor for cause and effect in modern history has been widely debunked; that was reasonable but probably premature. The more standing dominoes there are, and the more tightly they are packed, the greater the chances that one domino toppling will start a cascade.  During this period the world was growing ever more tightly packed with people (due especially to rapid urbanization), ethnic groups, buildings, vehicles, factories, telecoms, and weapons. More friction made for more heat. Social heat translates to instability, and instability to toppling.


Tankers Targeted

On two successive days in April, 2013, Muslim extremists blew up and sank a giant oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz and then another in the Strait of Malacca.  These two straits, the first leading in and out of the Persian Gulf and the second being the chief funnel for all Far Eastern commerce, were critical lifelines for global commerce in general and especially for oil tankers.  An intensive investigation found that the Hormuz strike was carried out by terrorists based in Somalia, while the Malaccan terrorists were from Indonesia and the Philippines.  Al-Qaeda claimed to have coordinated the strikes, and the investigation seemed to substantiate their claim.

Different methods of attack were used.  In the Hormuz incident, a private jet plane packed with high explosives took off from somewhere in eastern Yemen and slammed into the tanker just above the waterline, piercing the hull and igniting the cargo, causing a tremendous explosion.  In the Strait of Malacca, the next day, converted fishing boats were apparently used during the night to lay mines in the supertanker’s path.  The mine detonations slowed but didn’t sink her; that was the job of two large speedboats filled, like the jet plane, with explosives. (It goes without saying that these were suicide missions; destructive suicide had long since been the ultimate heroism in radical Muslim culture.)  The tanker didn’t explode, but its hull was breached, tons of oil were spilled, and the ship sank in the narrow strait, blocking traffic for several weeks.

These terrorist strikes had repercussions.  Stock markets staggered while the price of oil shot up to nearly $200 a barrel. Officials and pundits from all the advanced economies declared that this was an overreaction, but their assurances did little to allay the markets’ fears.  The anxiety was not so much about the damage caused by these attacks but about what the near future might bring.


Reactors and Reactions

What it brought came soon but from a different direction.  On June 19, just two months later, another Russian-built nuclear reactor suffered an explosive meltdown.  It was an RBMK-type reactor, the same relatively primitive technology involved in the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.  This time the disaster occurred in Russia itself, at the nuclear complex at Kursk, 500 miles south of Moscow.  The dynamics of the accident were much the same as at Chernobyl.  The staff monitoring the reactor were, in all probability, tired, bored and inattentive.  When an unexpected power output surge occurred, they apparently overreacted, and their attempt to shut down the reactor resulted in a still greater surge and an explosive loss of containment, sending a radioactive plume drifting over a wide area, mostly eastward. The Putin government doubtless would have preferred to throw a Soviet-style blanket (at least a temporary one, as in 1986) over media coverage of the event, but that was no longer possible in 2013.  This time the world was watching on CNN and YouTube as several hundred thousand people were evacuated over the next several days, many of them taken to hospitals and hastily thrown-up triage centers.

With the growing worries over fossil fuels, nuclear power had been enjoying a certain renaissance.  After Kursk, a strident debate arose between those who contended that nuclear power was simply too unsafe to be a major and growing industry, and those who argued that it was the least bad option.  The “anti’s” included veteran anti-nuke people but were now drawing in many others.  They pointed to the still-unsolved problem of nuclear waste and the growing fact of nuclear proliferation. The defenders ignored these matters and contended that new reactor technologies were far safer than the Chernobyl-Kursk design. The problem, they said, wasn’t so much antiquated technology as lax or corrupt management. The anti’s vehemently co-opted the last point and organized parades, picket lines and mass demonstrations.  This cause became the chief rallying point for left-wingers during this period and snowballed in a way which seemed somehow disproportionate to the specific grievance.  It was feeding, probably, on a huge reservoir of pent-up anger and frustration over many things that people, not just left-wingers, felt were metastasizing beyond anyone’s control—economic problems, governmental intrusion or incompetence, Wall Street arrogance, immigration, global warming, and terrorism. Within a few months it grew into an international one-size-fits-all protest movement.

The protests came to a head at a G-20 (major national economies) summit in Paris during the second week of October.  It was reminiscent of similar clashes in Seattle and Montreal around the turn of the century, but larger—by some estimates close to two million protesters jammed the streets of the City of Light.  It wasn’t well-organized; it was largely spontaneous, it was chaotic, and it was bloody.  Protest morphed into riot, destruction and looting. By the third day the police, even with all their reinforcements, were overwhelmed.  The summit was curtailed and the army called in.  During the night of October 13 vehicles and buildings all over the city were ablaze—the eery, smoky orange luminescence glowed on TV’s around the world—and the staccato of automatic gunfire continued for hours.  It was a wartime spectacle, but the war was soon over.  By morning the rioters were dispersed, arrested, wounded or dead.  By that evening the fires had been extinguished or had burned themselves out, and the city was a smoldering shambles.  The official count published several weeks later listed 12,088 dead, including protesters, civilians, police, firemen, and soldiers, considerably more than had died so far in the Kursk disaster. Property damage was estimated to be well over thirty billion dollars.  The media dubbed it (naturally if not altogether consistently) 13/13.

This “counterproductive calamity,” as it was described, sparked intense postmortem public soul searching and blame casting.  Most people seemed to agree with the protestors’ case—entangled and even contradictory as it might be—while deploring the violence.  The questions raised were the same ones that had been raised a thousand times, but they were good questions.  When the numbers are so large, how can you keep a peaceful protest from escalating into mob hysteria?  How much of it was stoked by drugs and alcohol?  How many guns did the rioters have, and where did they get them?  Should the army have sent more bullets skyward and fewer into the raging crowds?  Good questions, but the answers were mostly worn-out retreads.

Restoring National Pride

Before the Kursk meltdown sidetracked them, Moscow’s rulers had been planning an aggressive push to the west. Ever since the debacle of the 90’s, many Russians, especially the still-powerful nomenklatura left over from the Soviet regime, nursed feelings of having been belittled, humiliated and scorned by the West and by America in particular.  Russia had been left weak by the grandiose failure of Communism, but many Russians felt that the Americans exploited those weaknesses and tried to make them permanent. Russia still had lots of energy resources, smart scientists, weapons, and national pride. Vladimir Putin’s hold on power depended in part on stroking that wounded pride, and he did so with guile and gusto.  Kursk re-opened all the wounds, but Putin already had an answer. Attempts by Chechen nationalists to break away from Russia, including a series of terrorist atrocities, had been firing up Russian patriotism for a decade, and Putin’s propaganda industry fanned the flames, never more than in the aftermath of the reactor meltdown.  Patriotism became the national obsession, almost the national mania.  Brushing off and polishing up an old concept, the Kremlin identified itself—and Moscow and the whole country—as the Third Rome (after Rome itself and Constantinople).

Ever since taking power, Putin had been rebuilding Russia’s military forces.  In the spring of 2014 he sensed the time was ripe. The army conducted large-scale exercises just to the east of Belarus and Ukraine, and then in a “peaceful blitzkrieg” beginning, doubtless with deliberate symbolism, on May 1 (the Communist holiday), they flooded into those two countries.  Western governments were taken completely off-guard, since the consensus view of their intelligence services was that, while Putin and his advisers might consider such a move, they would surely realize it would be too provocative, too dangerous.

The Russians threw the dice nevertheless, knowing the dice were loaded.  Their “fifth columns” in both countries were large and well-prepared.  The autocrat running Belarus had his police and military put up token opposition before “accepting generous terms.” Ukraine was more difficult and genuinely risky, besides being considerably larger. The country was divided ethnically and politically between its western half, dominated by ethnic Ukrainians, and its eastern half, dominated by ethnic Russians, who held positions of political and economic power even where they were a minority.  The western half looked, with anxious hope, toward the West for its future security and identity, while the eastern half gravitated back toward Mother Russia.  The national government had long been torn between these two factions, but in 2013-14 the faction favoring closer ties with Russia held most of the levers of power.

So when the tanks and troop carriers rolled across the border, the response of the Ukrainian leadership was at first similar to that in Belarus. But fights soon broke out among members of the parliament in Kiev, with shouting, shoving and punching, each side accusing the other of treason or cowardice or something worse.  Nothing was decided, and meanwhile the Russian forces moved deeper into the country, reaching the outskirts of Kiev by May 3 and beginning to cross the Dnieper River.  Elements of the Ukrainian military with nationalist loyalties put up resistance at that point, with firefights breaking out across a broad front, but they were only able to delay the Russian advance.

  Where, in all this, was the response from NATO and the United States?  The Russian action was a blatant violation of their security interests, a poke in their eye. It turned out, though, that Moscow had correctly judged how weak their opponents’ hand was.  Psychologically, America was suffering another Vietnam Syndrome, a malaise reminiscent of the late 70’s.  The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were widely seen as bloody, bullheaded, budget-wrecking failures.  The economy struggled on, dragged down by protracted 10% unemployment, which in turn was caused largely by a long-term disconnect between the training and abilities of the workforce and the skills required by an evolving, tech-driven global economy.  The American public had no stomach at all for another major military campaign on the other side of the world.

Without American moxie, NATO was an empty shell.  Britain was undergoing similar problems, similar dejection.  The French discussed the matter brilliantly among themselves. For the Germans, of course, a land war against Russia was a psychic nightmare.  Consequently, NATO lodged a formal protest in the strongest possible terms at the U.N., and Russia re-absorbed Belarus and Ukraine into its Federation.  The leading newspaper in Warsaw ran a banner headline (translated):  AGAIN?

Tsunami

Over the next few months the world tried to come to terms with the new geopolitical map after what came to be called the Mayday Coup.  Blame was assigned and vulnerabilities were reassessed.  Summer came on with record-setting heat waves across both North America and Europe.  Then on June 29 a magnitude 7.7 earthquake struck under the Pacific Ocean, with an epicenter 400 miles east of Japan.  The resulting tsunami spread in all directions at about 500 miles per hour, giving the Japanese 45 minutes to prepare.  Their tsunami-awareness and cultural discipline paid off, and most people managed to evacuate the primary danger zone before the waters drew back two hundred meters and, a minute later, the first wave came ashore.  It was only four or five meters high but had more than a mile of water behind it—a mile of water pushing inland, now slowed to about fifty miles per hour, cresting to ten meters or more when it encountered obstacles like hills or large buildings.  Most hills survived, most buildings did not, nor did several thousand of the tail-enders fleeing the monster.

That was the first of three significant waves that struck Japan over the next two hours, a normal feature of tsunamis.  Human casualties were remarkably low for such a catastrophe, but Japan’s eastern littoral, several miles inland, was demolished.  The great ports at Yokohama, Osaka and Kobe would take years and perhaps a trillion yen to rebuild.  There were no guarantees.  The tsunami spread in other directions as well, but it had attenuated enough by the time it reached Southeast Asia, Hawaii, and the west coast of the Americas that the damage in those places was not as great.

Blackout

Several months later, in the first week of December, another kind of trouble hit the developed world: A sophisticated cyber attack crippled the power grid in the north-eastern quadrant of the United States.  The focus of the attack was the ASCADA system (advanced supervisory control and data acquisition system), an elaborate computer network that controlled the regional power stations.  Subsequent investigation suggested that the cyber attackers must have gotten into the ASCADA system at some low level, then quietly penetrated under the radar, perhaps for months, until they were able to throw the whole system into haywire.  Who were these attackers?  The source of a cyber attack is notoriously difficult to identify.  In this case the operation was too sophisticated for any but the most advanced, well-financed agents. The “usual suspects” were floated—Russia, China, Iran—but nothing was ever proved, and no serious suspects claimed responsibility.  Whoever they were, they did leave one cheeky calling card in the system, the short message:  DONT LAUGH YOU ARE NEXT.  No one was laughing.

The efforts of utility software engineers to repair or reconfigure the system were frustrated for over a week, and they wound up essentially having to replace it.  In the meantime the northeastern states, from Maine to Ohio and Pennsylvania, went without power for two weeks in mid-December.  Backup generators were pressed into service, but life mostly went on in the cold and dark.  Business and industry stopped.  Shipping slowed to a halt.  Emergency services were overwhelmed; during the final days of the blackout, surgeries were performed and babies delivered by lamplight and flashlight, with only blankets for warmth.  It was like stepping back a thousand years.

That was the first of several major cyber attacks during that decade. How directly these were connected to the YOU ARE NEXT threat was never finally determined. A 2016 attack on two large Japanese banks, probably originating in China, caused a financial crisis there that took more than a year to unwind.  The next year cyber terrorists confused the air traffic control system at Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport, causing one plane to crash land and shutting down that airport and most others in the region for a week. The source of that attack was never discovered. And in 2019 an attack crippled the control systems of three nuclear complexes in Iran, causing one partial meltdown and effectively setting their nuclear program back several years. Israel, of course, was the prime suspect.

The Niger Delta

The United States was still laboring to recover from the Northeast Blackout when, in February, 2015, their power supply suffered another blow—this time it was the whole world’s power supply.  The insurgency in southern Nigeria, which had been fitfully gathering steam for years, finally boiled over.  Up until that time, Nigeria had been the eighth largest oil producer in the world.  Most of the oil wealth, however, was siphoned off by the big oil companies who pumped, stored and sold the “light sweet crude” and natural gas, and by the usual corrupt government of a petrostate.  Tribes in the Niger Delta had seen their homeland turned into a smelly, toxic wasteland.  Their insurrection began as disorganized vandalism by poorly armed gangs, but over the years they grew in numbers, coordination, weaponry and tactics.  They fought against government police and soldiers as well as mercenary units hired by the oil companies to protect their personnel and facilities.  They targeted pipelines, storage tanks, and vehicles transporting industry workers.  The violence escalated, off and on, throughout the decade between 2004 and 2014.  Then in the opening weeks of 2015 the insurgent forces mounted a surprisingly well-designed offensive which, in short order, overwhelmed the defenders of most onshore oil production facilities and led to an orgy of killing and destruction.

That wasn’t the end of it, though.  In February, before the Nigerian government or the oil companies could regroup, the rebels followed up their triumph by attacking two large offshore oil rigs, using portable anti-tank missiles and rocket-propelled grenades.  Their armaments derived, in roundabout ways, from several countries including Russia and, ironically, the United States.  While they failed to capture or destroy those rigs, they damaged them enough to put them out of operation indefinitely.  More importantly, the assault caused the major oil companies operating in the region—Royal Dutch Shell, ExxonMobil, Chevron, and Texaco—to temporarily suspend operations while they scrambled to figure out how to protect their assets.  Overnight the price of oil in the markets jumped from $180 to $245 a barrel.  It seesawed around that figure for the next few months, then started moving upward again as governments increased their hoarding and investors discerned the handwriting on the wall. “Energy security” overtook unemployment atop the list of what most people were most worried about.  In the first quarter of that year, stock markets around the world lost an average of 22% of their value.

The problem wasn’t just that oil was our primary energy source, it was also the source of many things our civilization had grown to depend on, like plastics, lubricants, petrochemicals and fertilizers. Any threat to our oil supply was a threat to half our industries and literally to “civilization as we know it.”

Korean Holocaust

An even more serious political crisis threatened the world order that summer when the army of North Korea surged across the Demilitarized Zone and moved against Seoul.  The attack was not really a surprise.  For years the Hermit Kingdom had been wracked by famine in the provinces and factional struggles within the super-secretive leadership. And for years they had been lashing out with small but violent pinprick attacks, deliberate provocations designed to force South Korea and its allies (mainly the United States) to make further diplomatic concessions in order to avoid all-out war.

The 32-year-old Kim Jong-un had been, nominally at least, calling the shots since his father, Kim Jong-il, died in 2012.  All available evidence, however, indicated that he was a featherweight, and several factions within the party, the military, and the most powerful clans fought over control of the puppet. As both economic and political conditions grew more desperate, so, apparently, did whoever was actually in charge.  The government’s official pronouncements had been hysterical for decades, and by 2014 they were sounding maniacal.  The attack confirmed that impression.

The White House and the Pentagon had been game-planning this event for more than half a century, modifying their strategy as conditions evolved. Their thinking altered, naturally, when North Korea acquired nuclear weapons and when all efforts to persuade them to renounce those weapons in return for normalized relations with the outside world failed.

The assault began with a massive artillery and rocket attack against Seoul, just south of the DMZ.  There was an almost suicidal element in the ensuing North Korean attack.  When their battalions and tanks pushed into the DMZ and across the border, they advanced into a barrage reminiscent of the charge of the Light Brigade.  The difference was that this wasn’t a light brigade, it was close to a million well-armed soldiers with the constant threat of nuclear weapons backing them up. Even as decimated as they were by the defenders, within two days they had Seoul nearly surrounded.

Washington’s strategy—over the frantic objections of the South Korean government—was to immediately defang the cobra.  On the third day of the war, the Americans sent in three submarine-launched missiles armed with small nuclear warheads.  The targets were three sites believed to be missile launch platforms, at Kiljugun, Kanggyesi, and Yongbyonsi.  A fourth nuclear bomb was detonated over the main staging area for the North Korean army, twenty miles north of the border.  Simultaneously, stealth bombers and cruise missiles armed with conventional explosives destroyed the North’s military air bases.

This counterattack had immediate military and diplomatic consequences.  Militarily, North Korea was finished, unable to prosecute the war any further. Diplomatically, the world exploded with furious protest and finger-wagging.  The big risk in resorting to a nuclear counteroffensive, of course, was what China’s response would be.  In taking this risk, the Americans were strongly influenced by the course of events over the past few years—the economic morass, oil supply uncertainties, and especially the lingering cloud of expensive failure in Iraq and Afghanistan. Another long slog in Korea was politically and financially impossible. The choice came down to either abandoning the Republic of Korea after token resistance or taking the North out of action by nuclear means.  And leaving the ball in China’s court.

In the short term, at least, the gamble paid off.  China screamed the loudest; they encouraged an angry mob to sack and burn the American embassy (whose personnel had been evacuated out of the country just in time); they broke off diplomatic relations with the U.S.; but they held back militarily.  Even now it is hard to say just why Beijing didn’t retaliate militarily (though it is understandable that they didn’t care to trade missiles with America).  For one thing, they probably had no immediate forewarning of North Korea’s attack against the South.  For another, losing North Korea was like losing a cancerous finger.  In any event, they contented themselves with diplomatic rage, for the time being.





Chapter 3:  Storm, 2016-18

“Where will we look for answers when all the solutions of the past have failed?  The one with the right answer is the one who sees and seizes the future.” The Leader, Systemic Faith, 2018.


During this whole period, one of the main changes affecting most of humanity was steadily increasing urbanization.  The rate of population growth had slowed—except in the poorest countries who could least cope with it—but the total was still growing, and more and more of those people were gravitating to the cities, mostly in search of work and income. By their millions they crowded into cheaply built high-rise apartment buildings and jerry-built slums.  In 1960 there were no metropolitan areas with more than ten million people; by 2015 there were over forty.  This teeming congestion aggravated many other problems.  Disease spread faster, and so did drug abuse, gang activity (mostly around the drug trade), property crime and violent crime. Natural disasters like floods, earthquakes and cyclones harmed more people.

As 2016 began, the world was still reacting and adjusting to the cataclysm in Korea.  Over 200,000 North Koreans had been killed in the Three Day War, most of them soldiers in the first wave and those massing near the border to join the invasion.  Almost a quarter of the country was contaminated by nuclear fallout.  The primary question was what was to become of North Korea itself.  As humanitarian aid rushed in from many quarters, debate fumed over the political sequel.  Both South Korea and China claimed the territory—China as the “legitimate conclusion” to their forbearance during the war.  Most other nations supported the idea that it should become a “United Nations Special Zone,” something like an expanded DMZ on welfare.  The trouble with that was that the U.N. was chronically incapable of carrying it out.  So, as in other similar cases, the status quo lingered on.  Verbal wrangling and humanitarian aid continued, and China and South Korea both, in effect, extended their borders.


Earthquake and Hurricane

In March of that year a massive earthquake, 8.3 on the Richter scale, struck Istanbul, Turkey, a city of 13 million people. The result was compared with the devastation after the earthquake in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, six years previously, and in Kathmandu three years before. The difference was that Port-au-Prince was an underdeveloped backwater and Kathmandu a remote urban outpost, while Istanbul was a sophisticated modern city, a living historical monument and an international hub.  The wreckage there was more than just one more humanitarian disaster, it also sent an economic shock wave across Europe and the Middle East and around the world.  Which was worse, the loss of 360,000 lives, the loss of the Hagia Sophia, or the loss of untold billions of dollars in commerce?  The politically correct answer was the lives, but the real answer wasn’t that simple.  While it is true that the lives “couldn’t be replaced,” it is also true that the psychological and economic damage could scarcely be estimated.  “Recovery” from such trauma could never be more than partial.

They were still unearthing bodies in Istanbul when, on the first two days of August, a category 5 hurricane, dubbed Henry, swept into Miami.  In the years since Katrina flooded out New Orleans in 2005, there had been many Atlantic hurricanes, but none of them had been as destructive as Katrina.  Many people saw this as evidence that global warming, while it might be real and measurable, was not as dangerous as professional alarmists had been warning.  Henry changed all that.  It could have been worse; more than half the population had evacuated during previous week.  But it was the most violent storm ever recorded to date, with a top wind speed of 210 mph and sustained winds of 180 mph.  Those buildings in Miami that weren’t blown apart by wind were flooded or washed away by a 26 foot storm surge.  By August 4, when the storm moved on to the north (bringing record rainfalls and more flooding), the city was largely demolished.  People around the world wondered out loud:  Is any place safe any more?

Increasingly at this time, experts in various fields debated whether natural disasters—earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, volcanic eruptions, tornadoes, and so on—were actually occuring more frequently.  Statistics were batted back and forth.  Those who believed the increase was only apparent put forward three main explanations of the phenomenon.  First, population growth and urbanization amplified the damage to human life and property.  Second, terrorists had gotten better organized and had access to more powerful weapons. (It was emphasized that while terrorist acts are not “natural disasters,” the harm they cause is similar enough to include them in the discussion.)  Third, and generally considered most important, the global saturation of modern media made everyone aware of every calamity.  Earthquakes and typhoons half a world away came right into your living room—every day, if you wished to tune in or log on.  You watched the masked survivors carrying away the bodies.  No wonder no one felt safe.


The Crash of 17

The global economy had taken many hits, but it staggered and struggled on.  After the Great Recession of 2008-10 came the flat, stagnant “phony recovery” of 2011-14, during which time only the newer economies like China, Brazil and India showed significant growth.  Then serious inflation arose in almost every country, even where there was no economic growth.  Everyone’s money, in effect, was shrinking in value.  A great deal of money was still sloshing around, however, and nervous investors searched for the least bad place to put it.  In this environment, two bubbles started swelling in the markets:  a surge toward energy stocks and industrial commodities (iron, steel, copper, potash) and a Chinese real estate bubble.  The energy/commodities bubble began with the fundamental dynamic of limited supply trying to satisfy growing demand, but it escalated, in the old-fashioned way, into a stampede for profits while the getting was good.  Direct investment in Chinese real estate, meanwhile, was mostly limited by the government to Chinese punters, but savvy outside investors had ways to get in on the action.

What really galvanized the boom, however, were some new profit-multiplying gimmicks invented by clever people in the banking sector.  The bubble that grew and then burst during the previous decade had been sparked by financial derivatives (collateralized debt obligations, credit default swaps, and so forth), and the financial meltdown that brought on the Great Recession gave these things a bad name.  Bad or not, though, derivatives were still profitable for investment bankers, so they were reinvented or rehabilitated as “insured” and “integrated” derivatives.  These new entities, investors were assured, were fully debugged and fail-safe.  Those who do not learn from history, Santayana said, are doomed to repeat it.  And as P.T. Barnum observed, there’s a sucker born every minute.  By 2016 there was a compulsive gambler graduating every minute from a prestigious business school and going on to manage a multi-billion dollar portfolio for a major investment bank.  And there was still that steady supply of suckers.  As applied to financial derivatives, “insured” and “integrated” were just marketing mumbo-jumbo referring, vaguely, to abstruse mathematical formulas which might be good math, but might not relate point-for-point to the real world, the economic, human world.

All that being said, investor psychology was ripe for a big bubble (or two).  Investors, from billionaires to bus drivers trying to grow a retirement nest egg, were tired of being endlessly drubbed by bad news from the markets.  It was time, at last, to make some good news happen.  And so they did.  Stock markets went on an accelerating bull run from September 2016 through the following July, gaining an average of 48%.  This was from a low starting point, to be sure, but it was still an exhilarating run, reaching highs not seen for five years.

All during the boom, various people were warning that this bubble, like the last one and all the ones before, was self-destructive.  By the late summer of 2017 they had the dubious satisfaction of being proved right. Just as had happened nine years previously, some large investment banks suddenly found, like Wile E. Coyote in the cartoon, that they had ventured off the cliff edge and were standing on high air.  At that point they invoked, in suitably oblique ways, the too-big-to-fail clause:  Bail us out again.  The problem was that Western governments no longer had deep pockets.  Instead, they were deeply entrenched in sovereign debt, and virtually no taxpayer/voters wanted to increase that debt.  But, the bankers threatened (no longer obliquely), if we go down, we will bring you down with us.  That was true enough, and it left the political leaders in those nations in a hopeless bind.  In fast and furious teleconferencing, they agreed that they had only one option left.  Then in solemn addresses to their consituencies, flanked by national flags and colors, they advised everyone to take a deep breath, stay the course, hunker down, and either pray or think good thoughts.

Those speeches were given on Tuesday, August 29; over the next few days Goldman Sachs, Barclays, and BNP Paribas all went into bankruptcy.  As expected, the global financial system immediately froze up.  No banks that had any money left were willing to extend credit. They feared, reasonably enough, that any loan under these circumstances would be a bad loan.  Over those same few days all the major stock indices tumbled into freefall (like the Coyote), losing all their recent gains and much more.  In the bond markets, no one was buying anyone’s bonds.

Within a week the world economy was in a deep depression, with no fixes in sight.  Over the next several months international trade slowed to a trickle as demand slumped and protectionist barriers went up.  Businesses large and small, unable to obtain credit and running out of customers, failed.  Most airlines went out of business; in most countries, the government subsidized one national carrier.  Many trucking companies also went out of business; freeways were no longer congested.  A third of the workforce was out of work.

For nearly everyone, life became more local. As supermarket shelves emptied out, small farms, which had been dying out for generations, suddenly prospered, since people still had to eat.  Even with depressed prices, though, many people no longer had money to pay for farm produce. Various forms of barter evolved.  As economic desperation spread, gangs and militias formed almost everywhere, even in formerly prosperous and civilized suburbs.

Over the next few years, national governments generally found themselves unable to secure the cooperation of their citizens, or exert control over them, to the same extent as before the Crash of 17.  In consequence, national politics tended to become more intensely nationalistic, even fascist in some cases.  The rationale for this was that there was no other way out of the crisis—the same rationale that arose in Europe between the two World Wars.




Chapter 4:  Deluge, 2018-22

“All people are born in chains.  I will break your chains.  I will set you free.” The Leader, on posters and billboards, 2024.


The summer of 2017 was the driest on record in the Amazon basin, and this drought followed a sparse rainy season.  In early October, fires broke out all over the region.  High winds fanned the flames, and within a week several conflagrations had merged and were completely out of control.  Before the rains began in November and the fires burned themselves out, over 300,000 square miles were blackened ash.  Smoke clouds drifted across the Atlantic and spread a lingering brown haze over North Africa and Europe.  This event was one of the main things which, according to many scientists, contributed to the global temperature rising another full degree over the next several years.  Not only were tons of greenhouse gases added to the atmosphere all at once, but the loss of so much “carbon sink” (carbon dioxide absorbing vegetation) meant that in subsequent years, that much more carbon dioxide would remain in the atmosphere.


A Dramatic Victory

The Crash of 17 hit the advanced economies most directly, but the reverberations were felt throughout the developing world.  For China it was especially bad fortune.  The Party still called itself Communist, but for two decades it had been working, with considerable success, to invent a new hybrid, which might be called totalitarian capitalism.  This was essentially an oxymoron (if politics are regimented, can markets actually be free?), but from around 2005 to 2015 it seemed to be working so well that many other authoritarian governments tried to imitate it, with mixed results.

China’s main economic vulnerability was its dependence on exports.  The regime worked on increasing domestic consumption, but the country was simply so large, and still so largely backward and impoverished, that they ran out of time.  (No one will ever know whether, given more time, their contradictory project might have succeeded.)  As export markets shrank, factories by the hundreds laid off workers or shut down altogether, and political unrest boiled up.  Mass protests against the government—not unlike those in the West following the Kursk reactor meltdown a few years before—grew more violent.  In order to retain any legitimacy at all, the Party knew, they needed a dramatic “victory,” and they needed it now.  In hindsight, the answer they came up with seems obvious:  swallow, at last, the renegade province of Taiwan.

In making this move, Beijing’s military calculation was similar to Putin’s when he re-absorbed Belarus and Ukraine four years ago. The only serious obstacle in both cases was American military power. America’s defense commitment to Taiwan was firmer than it had been in Eastern Europe, and they had more military assets in the region.  All other things being equal, the chances that America would honor its promises to Taiwan would seem high.

Other things weren’t equal, however.  America’s economic and strategic position had eroded badly since then.  The country and its leaders were still reeling from the Crash.  In February of 2018, when the Chinese army and navy attacked Taiwan, no one in America knew whether their economy and the global economy had even hit bottom yet.  All attention was turned inward; political leaders were absorbed in forestalling panic. Certain segments of the political right wing called for a military response to the Chinese aggression, but even they stumbled at the question: What response?  After the holocaust in Korea, a nuclear response was out of the question (nuke Beijing or Shanghai and accept the same for New York and Los Angeles?).  America’s conventional forces could deter China’s attack, but at a drastic cost in ships, planes and lives, and they probably couldn’t change the outcome.  In the process they would finish bankrupting the American economy.  With all this in mind, Washington denounced China’s “naked aggression” and pulled back its naval forces. Taiwan’s own forces fought fiercely but were overwhelmed in ten days of bloody combat.  For the time being, the Party was back in the saddle atop their huge, turbulent country.


Apocalypse on the Subcontinent

The world at that time had regions even more politically unstable than the Far East.  The list of failed states—countries that were swamped by anarchy and poverty no matter what their nominal leaders might claim—kept growing.  Most of these were in Africa, but the most dangerous to outsiders, by far, was Pakistan, because of its ninety or more nuclear weapons. The withdrawal of most American forces from the Afghan theater in 2012 left Pakistan as politically fractured as ever, and it diminished the already shaky hold of the Islamabad government over its people.  The many radical Islamist tribal groups were divided among themselves but united against a government they saw as corrupt, apostate, and inept.  The main thing Islamabad had going for it was its control of the military, the counry’s strongest institution.  Increasingly, however, that control was undermined by officers and troops who were either sympathetic to the fundamentalists’ grievances, and thus reluctant to use force against them, or secretly in league with them.  Under these circumstances, the struggle for power was inevitably sporadic, confused and messy.  Both sides in the struggle, though, shared the fear that their conflict would embolden India, their prime enemy, to move against them, most likely in the disputed province of Kashmir.  Those fears may have been well grounded, but in the event it seems to have been the fear itself that caused the ensuing war.

By the summer of 2018—a summer of torrential heat which the monsoon rains only intensified—radical Islamist factions, including factions within the military, had gained control of two-thirds of the country’s territory, including most of the largest city, Karachi.  At that point perhaps half of Pakistan’s missile launching facilities, and as many as a third of their nuclear weapons, were in the hands of the insurgents.  No one seemed to know (or was willing to divulge) exactly what happened next.  The version most widely accepted at the time is that an Islamist commander, apparently under the impression that forces loyal to the regime (if it could still be called that) were about to retake his position, took it upon himself to launch a Ghauri-I medium-range ballistic missile targeted on Delhi. One inside source indicated that he paid large bribes to secure the necessary codes. Why he would trigger a war with India when he felt threatened by his fellow Pakistanis is not clear.  Possibly he heard voices, like Joan of Arc, and thought he heard the Prophet telling him to do it; probably we will never know for sure.  In any event the missile was launched, and several minutes later it was tracked on Indian radar.  There was nothing anyone could do to stop it.  At 5:35 pm local time the warhead detonated over Delhi, instantly killing half a million people and another half million within the hour.

India immediately retaliated by sending a dozen nuclear missiles targeted on Pakistani missile-launching sites and military bases.  Since many of those sites were near heavily populated areas, and since radioactive fallout covered much of the country, Pakistan ceased to exist as an organized nation-state.  It was millions of people dead or dying, wailing, crawling or running from horror to horror.  And this time the international community, exhausted from previous horrors and calamities, could do little to help the survivors.  There was even relatively little censure and scolding from foreign capitals; mostly there were expressions of mourning.  What else was left to say?


The Universal Caliphate

There was more left to do, however.  The adage that “all politics is local” became all the more true during this period. In the Middle East, the civil war in Iraq had gradually intensified since the American withdrawal in 2010-11. The main factions and their territories became more well-defined.  In the northern quarter of the country were the Kurds. During the aftermath of the terrible Istanbul earthquake of March 2016, the Kurdish rebels in eastern Turkey, in concert with their kin in Iraq, managed to establish a sort of de facto separate state.  This “Kurdistan” was recognized by neither Turkey nor Iraq (or anyone else), but they dug in and, hedgehog-like, defended their territory during the confused turmoil of the following decade.  The western half of the country was controlled by the Sunnis, the southeastern part by the Shias. Long-suffering Baghdad was once again a battle zone, the prize up for grabs.  In the course of the long struggle, the surrounding nations became more directly involved, no longer just covertly.  By 2018 armed forces from Syria and Saudi Arabia (Sunni) were clashing on numerous fronts with forces from Iran (Shia).  The fighting went on inconclusively, but in the spring of 2019 it produced one serious consequence:  a grassroots rebellion against the House of Saud.

The revolution on the Arabian peninsula had several sources, two of which were paramount.  First was the flagrant contrast between the luxurious, hedonistic lifestyle of the thousands of Saudi princes and the austere Wahhabi fundamentalism of most of the Arab population.  Second was the sharp decline in oil revenues following the Crash of 17.  Oil wealth had, of course, supported both the opulence of the Saudi regime and the welfare they spread around to appease the masses.  As welfare benefits shrank, so did the tolerance of Wahhabi mullahs and their followers.  Finally two leading imams took the extreme step and declared jihad against the corrupt, faithless regime.  A wave of suicide bombings ensued, but as had happened in Pakistan (and in Russia a century before), the turning point of the revolution came about when it infected the armed forces, many of whom were engaged in the murky conflict in Iraq. Like most political revolutions, this one was passionate and bloody, with no quarter asked or given.  After the first few chaotic weeks, the outcome was not much in doubt, and the self-styled Universal Caliphate—a name widely resented in the rest of the Muslim world and especially in Iran—was declared in September, 2019.  After that, both sides intensified their efforts in Iraq.


“Close Enough”

In the United States, as the summer of 2020 began, both major political parties were engaged in bitter presidential nomination campaigns.  Once the nominees were chosen, the election campaign promised to be even worse.  The basic and harsh dispute was over “who lost what”—who lost American prosperity, who lost Taiwan, who lost the Middle East, who lost America’s hope for the future. The way they debated these questions was childish, as usual, but there were good reasons for all the pessimism.  Many state and local governments were essentially bankrupt.  Unemployment stood at around 25%, but no one really knew what the figure was.  Many people had no steady job but worked irregularly, off the books, on farms or in auto repair shops or in the ubiquitous flea markets.  Loan sharking and the “protection” racket were still illegal but were flourishing, controlled by local mafias that fought savagely among themselves for turf and clout.  High schools looked and were run like prisons; since the inmates weren’t forced to attend, not many did. Like most everyone else, teenagers scratched for money any way they could—shoplifting, selling drugs, prostitution, or shaking people down, usually as gang members or wannabes.

On July 2 a terrorist group, linked with al-Qaeda but made up of U.S. and Canadian citizens, set off a “dirty bomb” in Cicero, a suburb of Chicago.  The device was a conventional but powerful bomb encased in radioactive materials.  It destroyed a city block and, more importantly, spewed radioactive residue over much of the urban area.  An evacuation began immediately, disorganized and panic-driven. It was eventually estimated that over a million people suffered radiation injuries of varying severity.  Greater Chicago was rendered uninhabitable for several centuries.

Over Al-Jazeera intervision, a spokesman for al-Qaeda claimed responsibility.  The bomb was intended to go off on July fourth, but the second was “close enough”; the attack was “payback for Pakistan.”  Two members of the terrorist cell were killed in the explosion, and three others were captured in the all-out manhunt that followed.  The FBI determined that they had brought the bomb into the country from Canada through the lakes region of northern Minnesota in a truck full of chickens.  No radiation detector was used at the border crossing.  Chicago was chosen as the target because they thought it would be easier than New York or Washington, D.C. The premature detonation apparently resulted from confusion and panic among the terrorists. Both the ultimate origin of the bomb and how it was smuggled into Canada remained in doubt; the group who brought it into the United States had been intentionally kept in ignorance.  Based on uncertain evidence, U.S. experts surmised the bomb was made in the old Soviet Union, but the Russian government categorically denied this.


The Great Flood

In China that same summer, record rainfalls combined with glacial melting in the Himilayas caused extensive river flooding.  At first the floods were described as the worst since 2010, but that comparison was blown away when a “small leak” in the gigantic Three Gorges Dam quickly became a “partial failure.”  A medium-size (magnitude 5.4) earthquake in the area was probably a contributing cause of the failure.  Several photos taken at this point made their way past the censors onto the Internet.  They show a horizontal jet of water about 60 feet wide and 100 feet high shooting as if from a giant hose.  Within the next half hour or so the gap in the dam widened and deepened, so that the velocity of the escaping water slowed while its volume increased.  From the Three Gorges, the Yangtze River flows 600 miles to the sea.  All the people living next to the river, and all their buildings and livestock, were swept away.  The megacities of Wuhan and Nanjing were devastated.  The flooding itself was a natural disaster, but the dam failure was a man-made disaster, probably the worst since the two world wars of the previous century.

Among the massive Chinese populace, this catastrophe also swept away the sense of patriotic elation over the retaking of Taiwan two years before.  All their various and accumulating grievances against the “Communist” regime were rekindled and flared up in hundreds of huge, spontaneous, violent protests and insurrections.  Local government officials were beaten or hacked to death, their buildings ransacked and torched.  The Party leaders in Beijing, however, had plenty of experience in handling this sort of thing.  They called out the army and implemented contingency plans.  But this insurrection was much bigger and more widespread than any preceding ones. Army units all over the country suddenly found themselves battling local mobs, and their orders from Beijing were to use all necessary force. Under the circumstances, tear gas and truncheons weren’t nearly enough, so officers ordered their men to open fire with automatic rifles and machine guns.  It was Tiananmen Square all over again, across the length and breadth of China.  And the outcome was much the same.  The fires were stamped down and martial law was imposed indefinitely.


Disaster Up Close and Personal

On December 4, 2020, Popocatepetl, the active volcano 40 miles southeast of Mexico City, erupted explosively.  The eruption was comparable to that of Mt. St. Helens in Washington State in 1980, but this time it affected a densely populated area.  Pyroclastic flows wiped out thousands of homes, businesses and people, and several inches of volcanic ash choked the entire city.

The question might be asked why natural disasters like the Kathmandu earthquake and the Popocatapetl eruption are included in a history of this period.  Such events have happened throughout history, after all, and are not unique to this time. And weren’t good things also happening during this period—acts of heroism and selflessness, ordinary people working hard under difficult circumstances?  All true, but the paramount thing is the psychological effect of such events occurring amid those circumstances.

The tenor of the times might be compared to the seventh century in Europe, with barbarian war bands everywhere ravaging Roman civilization, or to the mid-fourteenth century when the Black Death killed, in hideous fashion, around a third of the people.  In the time I am reviewing, the time that brought on the Troubles, it was the combination of “bad things” of all sorts, and their cumulative effect, that created so much anxiety and fear among people around the world.  So when they heard of a distant earthquake or typhoon or terrorist atrocity, it felt close to them.  And they did hear; a remarkable feature of this time is that, with all the wars and economic disruptions and other afflictions, telecoms were still flourishing—television, intervision (now omnivision), the Internet, and the omnicommlinks (“links” for short) that by that time were evolving from smartphones.  The sky might be falling, but the first priority was to stay connected and see it happening.  This came at a price, though.  Security, as a state of mind, no longer existed.
 
  By the spring of 2021 tensions between Israel and the Palestinians had once again cycled around to open hostility.  The “limited accord” they reached in 2012 had brought four or five years of relative peace, but world events over that time conspired against them.  America, the main support of both Israel and the “peace process,” was seriously weakened by the Crash of 17 and other adversities.  Civil war in Iraq combined with the fall of Saudi Arabia to Islamic fundamentalists in 2019 further destabilized an already unstable region.  Over the second half of the decade the Palestinian Authority gradually lost its long political rivalry with Hamas.  Effectively in charge of the West Bank and Gaza, Hamas ramped up both its propaganda and guerilla campaigns against Israel.  Rocket attacks increased, and also suicide speedboat-bomb attacks against Israeli commercial shipping (as in the Strait of Malacca incident in 2013).  To no one’s surprise, the Israeli government got tough again, hitting back hard against Hamas headquarters and other assets controlled by them.  Spokesmen for Hamas expressed confidence that even though Israel was stronger militarily, time was on the side of the Palestinians.  Most Israelis wouldn’t say so out loud, but they probably agreed.


Storm and Pestilence

The summer of 2021 brought unusually unsettled weather across the North American continent.  Record heat waves in some areas were joined by violent electrical storms in others.  The middle region of the continent was familiar with tornadoes and even with super-tornadoes, but this summer brought a succession of super-tornadoes—as black as night, several miles in diameter, annihilating everything in their path.  Over a dozen towns and suburban areas were completely destroyed.  Tulsa, Oklahoma looked like a giant bulldozer had scraped away the city center.  By the time the tornado season wound down, over 18,000 lives were lost.

North America wasn’t alone in experiencing violent weather that season.  In September, typhoon Helo, a huge tropical cyclone with winds in excess of 220 mph, came ashore in Shanghai and lingered for thirty hours.  The destruction was on the same scale as in Miami five years before, except that Shanghai had twenty times more people.  Chinese officials estimated as many as four million deaths, but it could never be better than a rough estimate. As for property damage and the cost of reconstruction, governments during this period were turning a corner. They no longer bothered to calculate the damage in monetary terms, since no insurance companies would be paying for it and reconstruction would never be more than partial.

Over the last decade, infectious disease rates had been rising around the world, largely as a result of spreading poverty and political and social deterioration.  People’s lack of access to clean water caused continuing epidemics of water-borne diseases.  In various regions there were epidemics of malaria, dengue fever, cholera, and hepatitis B, among others.  The greatest scourge, however, was AIDS.  People infected with the disease could be helped by a course of antiretroviral drugs, but worsening economic and political conditions limited their use.  Up until about 2012 the pandemic was focused in Africa, but by 2020 it had broken out and was surging in Southeast Asia, China, India, Central Asia, and Russia.  As it had done in Africa, it outran the medical resources in these regions and aggravated social and economic regression.

Along with disease came its companion, famine. Starvation became more common, especially among children, not only in Africa but in all the poorer regions of the world.  International aid programs had less money than they used to and were stretched far too thin.




Chapter 5:  Chaos and Collapse, 2022-26

“The Leader is the source and focus of all value.  He embodies humanity, and his values are humanity’s values.”  Timon Sadanta, address in Jerusalem, 2027


In February, 2022 coordinated terrorist strikes wrecked three offshore oil drilling rigs in the Atlantic, one off the coast of Africa and two off the coast of Brazil. The attacks were carried out not by Muslim terrorists or any other of the usual groups, but by a small mercenary navy funded, equipped and directed by an eccentric Australian billionaire named Cashel Mogren.  Mogren’s obsessional belief was that Big Oil was the main single force causing economic disintegration, global warming, and war—in short, just about all of humanity’s current problems.  The vessels he used in the attacks were bought second-hand from the Australian and United States Coast Guard, refitted, and armed to the teeth, particularly with missiles made in Russia and France and purchased through the clandestine international arms bazaar.  Mogren conducted this whole affair through layers of business fronts and offshore banks, a system set up and operated by a small team of smart lawyers. As a result, even though his political views and his culpability were widely known, he was never indicted, and civil suits brought against him by the oil companies came to nothing.  Nor were the United States Navy or any other navy able to intercept his vessels before they returned to the harbor he had built for them near Brisbane.  This buccaneering freedom on Mogren’s part underscored the general decline in international law enforcement at this time.

The loss of those three oil rigs would have been a pinprick back in boom times, but now it was like one more open vein in an oil production and delivery system that was hemorrhaging mortally.  To the chaos in Nigeria and the revolution in Saudi Arabia must be added the political implosion in Venezuela in 2015, which resulted in disorder and violence almost a bad as Nigeria’s and a steep drop in the nation’s oil production.  Mexico wasn’t much better off, since the powerful and lawless drug cartels undermined all other businesses in the country, including the oil business.

On top of these regional production problems was the drastic decline in international commerce of all sorts following the Crash of 17.  Those oil tankers still in service were increasingly at risk from pirates operating out of Somalia, Yemen, Madagascar, the Philippines and Panama, among other places.  These gangs were not as well funded as Mogren’s force, but desperation made them dangerous.  When they seized a tanker or container ship, they threatened to kill the crew and scuttle the ship unless a ransom was paid. Outcomes varied, but either way it was bad for business.


War and Arbitration (I)

Russia was the one country whose oil business was still turning profits.  They were Europe’s chief supplier of petroleum and natural gas.  Internally, the country had reverted to something like the Soviet Union without the Communist ideology, which had been replaced by strident nationalism. Russia was now a fascist state, a large and powerful one, still ruled by the new czar, Vladimir Putin.  Those who served the state usefully were rewarded with the usual perks, while the rest of the populace were regimented and poor, and solaced themselves with vodka.  Minimally treated, many were dying of cancer, liver disease and AIDS, and suicide was common.

Just as China’s invasion of Taiwan in 2018 was motivated by the regime’s need for a victory, so Russian fascism needed territorial expansion to justify itself.  Eight years ago, in 2014, that need had been temporarily satisfied by taking over Belarus and Ukraine. Now, as often in the past, Russia contemplated Poland with growing appetite.  Provocations were fabricated, amplified and ranted over. The Russian Army, already massed near the border, went on high alert.  Poland, naturally, reacted with every kind of alarm, trying to answer Russia’s accusations diplomatically while readying their own military (no match for Russia’s) and frantically summoning NATO.  In May of 2022 Russia launched its second Mayday Coup, hurling tanks, troops, artillery and fighter planes across the border.

This time, however, the response from the West was different. Europe and the United States were deteriorating economically, but the invasion of Poland seemed to push an emotional button.  Putin and his generals had miscalculated their adversary’s nerve; this was an aggression too far.  With all its troubles, the U.S. still had the world’s most advanced military, and Great Britain and France were more than weak sisters.  Russia’s chest-thumping over the last few months had not gone unnoticed.  The Russian advance was only in its second day when NATO hit back with everything they had, short of nuclear weapons (neither side in this conflict was willing to get annihilated). The fighting raged on for a week along a broad front east of Warsaw, with heavy casualties on both sides.

It soon became apparent that the only alternative to an almost unlimited expenditure of lives and materiel would be a negotiated truce, but neither side was willing to wave the white flag first.  The war was threatening to escalate to other parts of Europe and Russia when, in the last week of May, there was an intervention by an international negotiating team led by a new star figure in world politics (about whom more presently). Both Putin and the NATO leaders, although unwilling to show weakness, realized that a negotiated settlement was now in their best interest. A temporary cessation of the fighting was followed by a month of hot words and hard bargaining.  Without the arbitrating group, and especially their chief negotiator, the war would certainly have flared up again. But on July 1 a treaty was signed. The Poles ceded some of their northeastern territory south of Kaliningrad, while Russia paid a token indemnity and agreed to continue selling natural gas to Europe.

It was a brief war but a very costly one, particularly in military hardware.  Neither Russia, the European states, nor the United States were ever able to fully replenish their military forces.


The Big One

Then on January 14, 2023 the long-awaited Big One finally hit Southern California, with an epicenter near Ontario, a suburb east of Los Angeles.  The earthquake was indeed big, 8.9 on the Richter scale.  The damage to buildings and infrastructure was severe; many newer buildings remained intact, but most older ones were shaken to the ground.  Several fissures five to twenty feet wide opened up right across the urban area.  The death toll was remarkably low—estimated at around ten thousand—for a disaster of this magnitude, but around a million were seriously injured.  Paramedics and other health care workers were unable to reach many of these because the streets and freeways were buckled, collapsed, and choked with debris and wrecked or stalled vehicles.  About the only motor vehicles that could get from one place to another were motorcycles, and in many places even they were stymied.  Greater Los Angeles, the city that lived on wheels, now lived on foot.

Even as the injured were being treated by their families and neighbors as well as circumstances allowed, shortages of food and clean water grew more serious.  Helicopter drops alleviated the situation in the short run, but the prospects for digging out and then rebuilding the infrastructure and the economy were grim. Meanwhile there was widespread looting.  Liquor stores were stripped of all their intact bottles, resulting in a brief binge of mindless drunken mayhem.  By the time that wore off, everyone could see that the next few months, and even years, were not about partying but about survival.


An Unearthly Groaning

As I have mentioned before, the effects of global warming became steadily more apparent over these years. Hurricanes, typhoons, electrical storms, tornadoes, and river floods got larger, more destructive, and more frequent.  Droughts led to wildfires and human migration. Monsoon rain patterns shifted, becoming less predictable and more inundating.  Arctic ice reached northern coastlines only in the winter.  Around the world, glaciers melted and retreated at increasing rates.

The really big ice sheets, generally over a mile in depth, rested on two large land masses, Greenland and Antarctica.  As early as 2008, scientists monitoring the Greenland glaciers noted meltwater falling through crevasses and sinkholes all the way to the bedrock underneath.  Some scientists theorized that this melting could lead to any of several positive feedback loops whereby the friction holding the ice sheets to the bedrock might be eroded.  If that happened, substantial parts of those massive sheets could break loose and slide off into the ocean.  Some scientists doubted the theory, while others thought the disaster, if it happened at all, would probably occur gradually over a span of centuries. It turned out that the minority of scientists who emphasized the power of feedback loops to accelerate such processes were right.  By 2021 monitoring devices detected significant movement—beyond the normal “glacial” rate—in at least three major glaciers.  By the next year people could hear it—a deep, unearthly groaning.  During the summer of 2023 large chunks of Greenland’s glaciers, nearly ten thousand cubic miles altogether, moved like a super-slow-motion avalanche into the north Atlantic. Two years later a similar though somewhat smaller event occurred with the West Antarctic ice sheet.

All that added water, together with the thermal expansion of the oceans themselves due to climate change, raised sea levels an average of eight inches a year from 2024 to 2028, which was the last year measurements were made public; the seas are certainly still rising.  As a result, low-lying coastal areas, particularly river deltas, were heavily and irreversibly flooded. Most of those areas were densely populated—and are now even more so, as people are forced inland to higher ground. Bangladesh is in turmoil. New York City was badly flooded by a sea-rise augmented storm surge in November, 2027, which also caused the aging sewer system to back up. Similar problems have beset the Thames estuary, including London itself, and also Mumbai, Cairo, Buenos Aires, and Jakarta, among many other cities.  Drinking water sources in most of these places have been fouled by sea water.  Both Shanghai and Miami, already ruined by storms, are now permanently flooded, as also is most of New Orleans.


War and Arbitration (II)

In the summer of 2024 fighting broke out between India and China over disputed territories in the Himilayan region.  They had previously fought a war over the same turf as far back as 1962, but the grievances behind that conflict (won by China) were never resolved.  Additional tensions between the two giant countries had been growing ever since and had become critical by 2024.  The main tension centered on control of the major river systems originating in the Himilayas.  In addition, for several years they had both been maneuvering for control over Myanmar (Burma), which had joined the list of failed states.  It was a feudal, violent place, but one rich in natural resources which both China and India coveted, both being by this time economically desperate.

The 2024 war started in the Himilayas but quicky escalated to include both Myanmar and major naval engagements in the Indian Ocean, the Bay of Bengal and the South China Sea. The danger of the war going nuclear was imminent when, in January 2025, a negotiating team intervened, led by the same man who arbitrated the settlement of the Russo-European war in 2022 (about whom more quite soon). This team—really, this man—managed to persuade the leaders on both sides to come to the negotiating table. Exactly what happened in those talks has never been made clear, but three weeks later a treaty was signed.  The terms of the treaty, as least as published, were curiously vague, but the outcome basically was that both sides backed down to the status quo ante.  To thoughtful observers (those few who were not too overwhelmed by their own circumstances to observe) it was an odd and unexpected denouement.


Over the Edge

The major events of the next eighteen months, culminating in the Great Collapse of 2026, may be briefly summarized.  The dominating event was the influenza pandemic which broke out in the spring of 2025 in Central Asia and swept across most of the planet.  It came on too fast for a vaccine to be developed, and in any case by that time international medical resources were seriously depleted. Indeed, there was little inter-national coordination of any kind left.  By the autumn of 2026 the pandemic was on the wane, but somewhere between 300 and 400 million people had died of the disease.

The political situation in the Middle East, meanwhile, had gone from bad to worse.  Israel’s latest get-tough policy had last-ditch overtones to it, and the surrounding Muslim states smelled blood in the water.  Over the last few years they had been firing themselves up for a showdown, and in the summer of 2026, as the influenza pandemic was burning itself out (the Arabs blamed it on Israel), they massed their forces for a coordinated assault.

In 2025-26 major earthquakes struck in Peru, Missouri, Iran and China.  There were explosive volcanic eruptions in the Philippines, Japan, and Indonesia. Desperate, ragged skirmishes were being fought in many places over access to water and food.  Culmulatively it was all more than human organizations could bear, and everywhere they were breaking down.

In September, 2026, the global banking system finally collapsed altogether, literally overnight. Everyone’s money became worthless, because no one trusted anyone’s ability to repay debts.  Everyone was thrown back on his or her own resources, which were dwindling fast.  There was only one man alive who could do anything about the calamity.

And he did.




Chapter 6:  The Leader

“In obeying him, we obey ourselves.”  Timon Sadanta, speech in Jerusalem, 2027


He was born in 1980 near Zurich, Switzerland.  Like everyone else he had a family name and a given name, but since consolidating his rule over the World Authority, he has decreed that a birth name would lower him to the level of everyone else. He is now simply the Leader, in every language. This is perhaps the one point on which, for reasons of my own, I concur with him.  His name is unspeakable.

He is, nevertheless, the Leader, and I will fill in what is generally known of his biography.  His father was Syrian, a man of inherited wealth who increased that wealth as a banking executive, first in his native country and later in London, Paris, and Zurich, where his son of destiny was born. The Leader’s mother was French; from both parents he inherited a diversity of blood lines.  He was educated in Paris, earned a degree in economics at Cambridge University and then an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.  A natural athlete, he became a world-class skier and yachtsman. According to some accounts he trained and served in the French army’s Special Forces Brigade from about 2004 to 2008, but this is unclear.  What is clear is that by 2009 he was making a name for himself in the global information tech industry, first at Cognizant, a U.S. firm, and then Infosys, the Indian giant.  From there he followed his father’s lead, moving into executive positions at Credit Suisse, in both the investment banking and asset management divisions.

In 2017 he became the youngest-ever Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), in which capacity he led the financial system’s response to the Crash of 17 and was widely credited with keeping the system from imploding completely. In 2018 he published the bestseller Systemic Faith: What Holds Us Together.  (Along with telecom services, the book publishing industry survived the crash fairly well; bestsellers, at least, kept selling.)  It was at this time that he became the favorite darling of the global media, a statesman with wit and charm, the prize guest on everything from the BBC and CNN to late-night talk shows around the world (he spoke at least seven languages fluently).  He had the rare gift of being all things to all people.

In 2021 he published Under the Table: How They Undermine Us, a scathing, tell-all indictment of global movers and shakers—politicians, autocrats, business leaders and so on—who, he claimed, hypocritically pretended to working for the common good while in fact they were lining their own pockets at public expense. In his books and other media appearances, he presented himself as a “global citizen,” contending that nationalism had run its course and was outdated, unworthy of the future of humanity.  He was, of course, the chief negotiator responsible for ending the war between Russia and Europe in 2022—for which he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize (the last one)—and also the one who ended the war between India and China in 2024.


The Entertainment Culture

A summary like this gives some idea of the man, but an inadequate one. To understand him better and his rise to power, we need to examine some further aspects of the global society as it developed during this period.  Back when the good times were rolling, in the two decades before 2008, entertainment played an increasing role in the lives of people throughout the developed world, and many in the developing world did all they could to join in the fun. Even during and after the Great Recession this trend continued—why not have fun while the sky is falling, as long as it hasn’t landed on you yet?  The entertainment industry became very big business—music, movies, satellite TV, pornography, casinos, cruise liners, rock concerts, sports, iPods, video games, Las Vegas and Macau. Formerly, except for a small cluster of idle aristocrats, entertainment had been a sideline, something reserved for leisure time, which was usually scarce. It was a diversion, a temporary and pleasurable escape from the business of real life.  For many people in this new era, however, their job was just a necessary interlude in the real life of having fun. With ubiquitous WiFi and smartphones, and then omnicommlinks and omnivision, the dominance of entertainment affected all our institutions and transformed many of the major ones, including politics, merchandising, and the news industry.

The mainsprings of entertainment in this new global culture were sex, drugs, and violence. The sexual revolution of the Baby Boomer generation was embraced and institutionalized by Hollywood, television producers, and advertisers, so that “soft” pornography saturated the advanced societies and hard porn was only a click away for whoever wanted it.  Social restraints against casual, recreational sex vanished except for halfhearted appeals to keep it “safe.”  Alcohol, tranquilizers, amphetamines, marijuana, cocaine and heroin were widely relied upon to keep people in the “feel good” state required by an entertainment culture. And the hunger for vicarious violence was fed by redundant mayhem in movies, television (then intervision and now omnivision) and video games, as if the gladiatorial games of the decadent Roman Empire had gone global through some technological miracle.  Strategists in the media, in marketing and in politics concluded that in order to maintain or increase market share among the consuming public, they must grab and hold the public’s attention by entertaining them—relentlessly, luridly, and noisily.

No part of the entertainment industry thrived more than gambling. (The industry preferred the euphemism “gaming,” but the game was strictly gambling.) People gambled for fun, for thrills, and especially for money.  Money was the lodestone, both for the legions of small-time players and the growing coterie of really big-time players—commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds, sovereign wealth funds, and assorted billionaires. The only real difference between Las Vegas and Wall Street was the size of the bets. The world-class players were competing in what came to be called “the big casino”—the global financial system—to see who could make the riskiest bets, the ones that pay off the biggest when you win.  Of course these bets could push your firm toward bankruptcy if you lose, and in the process they might pull down the whole casino on your collective heads, but the gambler’s testosterone-charged conviction was that I will win, the others will lose, and if the casino is collapsing, governments will have to bail us all out one more time. And if they can’t or won’t, that’s just too bad.  My personal fortune is safe in a Swiss bank.

Or at least it was safe up until the Crash of 17. After that, even Swiss banks hunkered down and protected their money.  Their oldest, best customers could still draw funds, but it became increasingly clear who really controlled the gold.  Even now there are many who don’t realize who was then gaining control of the banks.  During the two decades after 2010, while he was building his fame, influence and worldwide popularity, the Leader was also expanding his immense personal fortune—hundreds of billions of dollars—while also, very quietly, building his global network of influential people, secret associations, and disguised websites. I realize that this sounds like alarmist conspiracy theory, but with the Leader it was entirely practical.


Superstar

His rise to power was the ultimate media event in a world society saturated with media and addicted to entertainment.  He himself was the star of stars; it was all about personal magnetism. He combined the charm of a talk show host, the gravity of a Supreme Court justice, the command of a battlefield general, and the glamour of a Hollywood idol.  He was mysterious, sexy, brilliant, and dangerous.  His mind awed the intellectuals, his personal force intimidated the powerful, and his appearance (on omnivision everywhere) melted the sensuous.  In a world infatuated with superficial celebrity he was the tabloid king.  In a gambler’s world he was the highest, hottest roller.  In a violent world he emanated cool but lethal menace.

A curious episode highlights the kind of legends that were growing around him.  In Under the Table, his 2021 bestseller, many world figures and other well-known people came in for his exposure and, sometimes, his ridicule.  One was Leo Scharrens, chief finance minister of the European Union. Scharrens was high-profile, outspoken and ambitious. The Leader lampooned him as a neurotic, randy windbag. He included a couple of photographs, one showing Scharrens with a barely dressed prostitute hanging on his arm and the other of Scharrens in a garish cross-dressing getup. There were rumors that Scharrens’ lawyer talked him out of suing, but that remained in doubt. What wasn’t in much doubt was that the photos were computer-generated fakes, and that one week after the book came out, Scharrens assaulted the (future) Leader as he was exiting a meeting at a hotel in Luxembourg.  Specifically, Scharrens smashed his skull with a claw hammer (carried in his briefcase), then ran into the meeting room shouting about what he had done and why. Security people engulfed him, while others rushed to aid his bloodied victim.

Eyewitness reports under such circumstances are notoriously unreliable, but most claimed the fallen man was certainly dead.  A minute later, however, he walked back into the meeting room, streaming blood and parting the crowd like Moses. He grabbed the stunned Scharrens, lifted him overhead like a barbell, and hurled him across the room.  (Scharrens suffered a concussion, separated shoulder and broken wrist, but survived.)  Then the Leader calmly went to a restroom, washed himself and tied a towel around his head.  The whole affair, doubtless distorted as such legends are and amplified through propaganda, was celebrated in the media as a modern-day miracle.


The Light Bearer

In filling in the background to the events of the late 20’s, one other figure also looms large.  This is Timon Sadanta, a world luminary in his own right, who became the Leader’s chief herald.  Sadanta was born in central Africa but was adopted in early childhood by a devoutly Roman Catholic couple from Salzburg, Austria. Educated in Catholic schools, he was a brilliant student and went straight into the priesthood.  The only thing that stood in the way of his meteoric rise in the Catholic hierarchy was his heterodox theology. In fact this didn’t slow his advancement much; he was an archbishop when, at the age of 41, he broke from the Church to found a new religious movement which he called Light Bearers to Humanity.

As it had evolved by this time, Sadanta’s theology was eclectic. To the best of my understanding the main tenets are these:  The whole universe is divine, or is impregnated with divinity.  The Earth is a special focus of divinity, as also are human beings. The Earth communicates spiritual truth through various symbols—mathematical, cultural, and religious.  All people can understand these symbols in a vague way, but only the initiates—the Light Bearers—are able to decode their true meanings.  The deeper an initiate advances into the EarthFire (Sadanta’s term), the greater his responsibility to guard this knowledge from the unenlightened and reveal it, in secret ways, to initiates coming behind him (or her—supposedly women can be initiates, but most are men). While the core of the knowledge is secret, the Light Bearers proclaim that it has revolutionized their lives and their understanding of moral truth.  “The truth that frees you is the truth that reverses all things” is one of Sadanta’s famous sayings.

Initiates undergo a series of testing ordeals, which are rumored to be severe.  One might think that such an initiation process would deter new converts, but the movement’s explosive growth suggests the opposite.  During the last ten or fifteen years it has gained millions of adherents, most of them converts from long-established religious traditions.  The worse their lives have become with regard to physical security, it seems, the more they are attracted to Sadanta’s “new gospel.”  The movement has also benefitted from being widely covered and often lionized by the media. Sadanta himself has become something between a cult figure and a superhero.  His style of dress, in public, combines the look of a medieval cardinal and a gothic rock star.  His voice, though, is probably his greatest asset: a mellifluous deep baritone that resonates with perfect articulation in whichever language he is speaking (like the Leader he speaks many languages).  It is said, apocryphally no doubt, that he once held an audience of cats spellbound for two hours.

The reason I have devoted so much attention to Sadanta and his religious juggernaut is that he was instrumental in the Leader’s rise to power. The origins of their personal association are obscure but probably go back many years.  Whether the Leader himself is a Light Bearer has never been publicly acknowledged, but the general assumption is that he must be one of the Circle of Five (the deepest initiates).  My own assumption is that he is the Circle of One, but in all his public statements he has refrained (until very recently) from criticizing any religion or identifying himself with any.

How the world’s religions, both the clerics and the followers, responded to the Leader is a key part in the story of his rise. Unlike many world leaders, he wasn’t hostile toward people of faith and didn’t regard them as delusional. He gave them honor, and they, overall, returned the favor.


“Strange Coalition”

As I said before, the global banking system ground to a halt in September, 2026.  The financial system depends on trust—lenders trusting borrowers and vice-versa—and at that point all trust had vanished.  Earlier that same year, however, over a three-week period, the Leader held private meetings with the leaders of Russia, Germany, and Iran. All three nations, by that time, were fascist states of different stripes, ruled by iron-fisted autocrats.  By all reports, those three autocrats came out of those meetings looking like they had swallowed a toad.  After the third meeting they held a joint news conference at which they swore allegiance to the Leader, and as simply as that the Triple Coalition was formed.  The story behind this event was reported in some depth by the well-known investigative journalist and blogger Vincent Baron, in a blog entitled “Strange Closeting, Strange Coalition.”  He speculated on what kind of power or influence the Leader must have exerted over those three.  Was it some form of political pressure, or possibly even physical threats?  Baron concluded that it probably was psychological intimidation, even some sort of hypnotism. Shortly after that blog was posted, Baron disappeared and the blog with him.

We have already noted the course by which Russia embraced fascism under the banner of the Third Rome. In Germany, after the Crash of 17, there were several years of extreme political polarization. Strong and generally unscrupulous right-wing parties clashed with an almost equally strong left wing haunted by memories of Nazism.  In 2024 a right-wing regime took power, though its ideology was less messianic and more insular than Hitler’s; it was “Germany for the Germans.”  Iran was still ruled, with increasingly totalitarian methods, by Muslim clerics.  What, one might ask, besides despotism did these three states have in common that might unite them in a Triple Coalition? The answer prefigures the way the World Authority came into being not long thereafter:  What they had in common was the Leader himself.


The Peace of Jerusalem

In the middle of August 2026 the Arab states surrounding Israel, having completed their military preparations, launched a barrage of rocket and artillery fire, followed by a tank and infantry invasion on all fronts. The Israelis, of course, knew it was coming and were as prepared as they could be. As soon as the invasion began, Israel’s prime minister warned that if it continued, he would have no choice but to retaliate with nuclear strikes against the capitals of all the aggressor states. No one doubted his sincerity, but the invasion continued anyway.  After a week of ferocious fighting the Israeli lines were being pushed back.  Tel Aviv was shattered and burning.  Everyone expected to hear very soon, even within the next hour, that Beirut, Damascus, Baghdad, Amman, Riyadh and Cairo had been obliterated.

What happened instead in the next hour was that the Leader, having given short notice to all the belligerents, flew into Jerusalem aboard his personal Boeing liner.  As the head of the Triple Coalition he demanded an immediate cease fire.  All parties were to send an official delegation to Jerusalem, and the negotiations for a settlement would commence in 48 hours.  At this point the Arabs held the upper hand militarily, except for Israel’s very real nuclear threat. Both Israel and the Arabs were perfectly aware, however, of the power of the Triple Coalition looming over both of them. At this table, the Leader held the strongest hand.  So the fighting stopped and the arbitration began on September 2.  It was while these talks were going on that the world’s financial system froze up on September 7-8.  On September 10, Israel and all the Arab states signed the Peace of Jerusalem.  It was an astonishing document, and even then everyone understood that it was the Leader who essentially dictated its terms.  In return for not having their cities annihilated, the Arabs laid down their arms and went home.  In addition, Israel was allowed to rebuild its Temple right next to the Dome of the Rock (there is room for both on the Temple Mount).  The side-by-side structures, the document said, would symbolize and enshrine the new peace.

How the Leader pulled this off, and why, are good questions.  On the surface it sounds like Israel got the better of the deal. It was widely speculated (and I believe) that the reason Israel withheld its nukes was that the Leader had been in secret communication with them.  But what about the Arabs?  As the ruler of the Triple Coalition, the Leader was now supreme in Iran, the heartland of Shia Islam. The grounds on which Iran entered the Coalition were that Iran’s ruling cleric, following the “strange closeting” a few months before, recognized the Leader to be the Mahdi, the Twelfth Imam, and declared him to be so.  The Mahdi is to Muslims, especially Shias, what the Messiah is to Jews and Christians. At a stroke, nearly half of the Muslim world now revered the Leader as the ultimate messenger of Allah.  That was the official line, at any rate; this declaration produced extreme confusion and division in the ranks. Most Sunnis also believe in the Mahdi, though they differ with Shias over his identity. Iran’s recognition of the Leader as the Mahdi also created turmoil and division in the Sunni world. But the intricate web of loyalists and debtors that the Leader had woven over the last ten years included many Arabs, and now he issued his quiet summons.  Many Sunnis also declared him the Mahdi, and the rest were disorganized and intimidated.

As to why the Leader ordained the terms of the Peace of Jerusalem as he did, that would only become clear a few years later.


The World Authority

So the Peace was signed on September 10, even as the global economic system largely ceased functioning. On September 15, the Leader announced—over live omnivision and through all functioning news agencies—the formation of the Complete Coalition.  To the original three states were now added seven more: the United States, Great Britain, France, Brazil, Japan, Australia, and Canada. (India and China, as a result of the 2025 treaty, were also effectively under the Leader’s thumb.) Then, six days later, the Leader proclaimed the World Authority.  As of September 21, 2026, the Leader ruled the world.

This summary shows how rapidly these events occurred but gives little idea of the atmosphere in which they occurred.  All over the world, in every region, people lived in fear and desperation.  Most people were hungry or starving; many were sick or homeless.  The strong took from the weak. National governments had lost all control. The megacities had fallen into anarchy.  People had run out of hope—except for the glimmer of hope held out by one man.  But that one man was the most admired and celebrated man on the planet, the one absolute superstar. If anyone could lead the world out of its current calamity, he could.

Ever since the Crash of 17, the Leader had worked to keep international telecoms on a firm footing.  Now, in the chaos of 2026, his calm, handsome face, his reassuring smile, his magnetic eyes, and his commanding voice were watched and heard on onmivision and omnicommlinks all over the world as he announced the advent of the World Authority. Law and order, he promised, were being restored even as he spoke. Emergency food supplies were being delivered. All existing currencies would be backed by the Authority until the new world currency was circulated.  The Great Collapse, he declared, was over.

Human nature being what it is, the main thing people needed at that time was hope, and in the Leader most of them found it. His announcement of the World Authority was followed immediately by Timon Sadanta giving a fiery accolade, acclaiming the Leader as the Great Peacemaker and the Great Restorer, and calling on all Light Bearers and their followers to fan out across the globe and spread the good news to those who might have missed it.

Overall, the clarion call to pull together and trust the new government worked.  By the start of 2027 many pockets of disorder and gang rule remained, but the tide was with the Leader.  Over the last two years, in isolated locations around the world, spending his funds lavishly, he had been organizing and training thousands of Special Police (SP). By the time he sent them forth, the same day he announced the World Authority, they were more like military special forces than ordinary police.  They were heavily armed, fast and efficient.  To the officers of existing police and militia they put the question:  Are you with us or against us?  The few who resisted them were eliminated. Meanwhile all the media, most of them voluntarily, were trumpeting the same message:  We’re all in this together, we stand or fall together—let’s pull together!  Follow our Leader together!


The Light of Man

The general result, by the spring of 2027, was a shared feeling of relief.  Law and order had indeed been substantially restored.  The global economy was moving again, though it was tightly controlled by the Authority, and food and other essentials were rationed. Dissidents and troublemakers were dealt with.  Ordinary people faced a difficult choice.  They could try to steer clear of this new, sudden and heavy-handed regime and get on with their lives as best they could. Or they could apply for some position in the mushrooming new bureaucracy that administered the Leader’s policies.  That might offer advantages, but it would also put you under closer and constant scrutiny by the Authority. You might survive, you might even prosper, but your life would belong to them.

The Leader flew from country to country and city to city within his domains and was received everywhere with enthusiastic acclaim. In Rome, the pope embraced him.  To the surprise of many, however, he made Jerusalem his capital and took the rebuilding of the Jewish Temple as his pet project. On Passover that year—the timing could not have been accidental—he named Timon Sadanta the Spiritual Advisor to the World.  In his inaugural address in that capacity, Sadanta announced what the EarthFire had revealed to him. The divine status of all humanity had been confirmed and established, a divinity that was focused in the Leader, who was the Man, the Messiah, the Mahdi, the Reincarnated One, the Deliverer, the Protector. In honoring him, Sadanta proclaimed, we honor ourselves. In exalting him, we exalt ourselves. In loving him, we love ourselves. In obeying him, we obey ourselves.

Church buildings, synagogues, mosques and temples were converted to the practice of this new religion, called the Light of Man. The Authority, represented on the local level by the newly expanded Special Police, “encouraged” all citizens to participate in Light of Man ceremonies. Those who stayed away were discouraged by being roughed up and losing their ration cards, so most of us went.  The services, I thought, were rather disappointing.  We, the unenlightened laity, sat in rows in dim light and watched the white-robed initiates performing elaborate occult rituals, until I found myself praying for an end to the ordeal.  I know the idea was that we would be so jealous of their status, so eager to be let in on their secrets and so mortified at being left out, that we would be lining up to be accepted for initiation. Many did, of course. I have never been very religious, though, and this Light of Man business was soaked in religion.

Around the world, most people accepted the new cult, often with enthusiasm.  Among Jews, Muslims and Christians, though, there were many who resisted, more or less openly.  The pope changed his mind and denounced the Light of Man as rank heresy.  The next day the SP stormed the Vatican and deposed the pope, mowing down dozens of Swiss Guards in the process.



Chapter 7:  The Euphoria

“Make no mistake:  We have the situation under control.  All the traitors have been detained.  None will slip through our net.”  The Leader, omnivision announcement, September 12, 2029

As 2027 wore on, the world settled in to the new arrangements. The Authority grew rapidly, one might say cancerously, swallowing existing bureaucracies and digesting them until they were part of its own.  Freedom of speech and association were curtailed; you were free to say what you were supposed to say and associate with people who did as they were supposed to do.  Mandatory evening classes drilled you in what you should think—about our Glorious Leader, about the Authority and its Special Police, about the Light Bearers and the Light of Man cult, and about the vileness of people who were negative, cynical, arrogant, or different.  There was no longer any private life or private business; all employment was through the Authority. Whatever the Authority might require people to think about their “abundant life” in the “New Way,” though, the reality was scarcity and hunger.  A ration card did you little good when store shelves were empty. To keep people’s minds off their hunger, there were weekly parades and festivals celebrating the Leader. Attendance at parades and festivals was mandatory unless you had a validated exemption.

That was the general state of affairs. Conditions varied, of course, in different parts of the world. My sources of information about this period are limited, but it’s safe to say that in the more thoroughly impoverished parts of the world, like Africa, Central America, Central Asia, and most of India and China, people were even worse off than elsewhere. Most of the megacities were hellish.


Tears of Joy

I recollect a time when summer and autumn were the best seasons of the year.  By 2027, summer brought unbearable heat and humidity. Air conditioning was only a memory, except of course in the Leader’s scores of mansions and recreational compounds around the world.  Earthquakes continued to strike in various places—definitely more than in the past. Thousands and perhaps millions died in droughts, hurricanes and floods.

But life went on, such as it was. Then in the spring of 2028, rumors began circulating of an odd and unexpected religious revival, or mania—one certainly not sponsored by the Authority. Apparently the Jews and Christians, particularly those who laid low during Light of Man events, were getting together, reconciling with one another. The Jews, it was said—I myself am not sure how much of this to believe—were “repenting” for having rejected Jesus, their Messiah.  Their Messiah.  And the Christians were repenting for persecuting Jewish people over many centuries on trumped up pretexts. It was, the rumors said, as if John the Baptist was holding forth again in a thousand different places. It was being called the “tears of joy” movement—in whispers, because the Authority prohibited any mention of it in public.

The reason I am going into this is what happened a year later, so bear with me.  As for myself, I saw only a little of what was going on.  From time to time I saw people embracing on the streets and suspected I was spying on tears of joy.  I heard of Jewish-Christian gatherings in locked apartments, with the curtains drawn, where they worshiped a Messiah other than our Beloved Leader. Suspicions along these lines were clearly confirmed when Timon Sadanta delivered a message over all omnivision channels on the subject of Wisdom.  Here is some of what he said, or resonated, in that inimitable voice:

“Wisdom!  Wisdom calls aloud in the street, but who has lent an ear?  Hear me, my children, who in the end can resist her call, who can turn back her tide?  From the heart of the earth Wisdom has spoken.  I am merely the unworthy one chosen to speak forth her word, which no man can turn aside or withstand.

“From the fire in the heart of the earth I bring you her word, and it is a harrowing word, a word at which the faithless tremble, a word from which the renegade shrinks.  And where is the renegade, who is the faithless one?  They are not one, my children, they are legion, and they are in the very midst of you.  They are beside you in the marketplace.  They may sit beside you at the table.  Wolves disguising themselves as sheep!

“And who are they?  They are the ungrateful ones. Ungrateful! Ungrateful to the earth, ungrateful to humanity. Ungrateful for all they have been given, ungrateful for the New Life they enjoy. Ungrateful, my children, to our sublime Leader!  Vile ingratitude, sick ingratitude, repulsive ingratitude!

“Can there be more than such ingratitude?  Can there be worse? With such filth there is nothing but worse. They are selfish. Selfish!  They care nothing for the community, the society, the state—for you, my children.  Selfish, arrogant—arrogant in their selfishness.  Slimy arrogant vermin!  They worship the past—insanity! They dare to compare a pathetic impostor, a dead man, to our incomparable Leader!

  “Hateful ones, filled with foul hate.  Listen to them, my children, listen to them and hear their foul lips dripping hate.  No, my children—do not listen to their hate!  Do not listen when they come and whisper in your ear, telling you that their way is the only way.  Their way?  Selfish!  Hateful!  Whispers of demons!  Joy, they will hiss at you. Lies, desperate lies! Can there be any joy, any happiness, out there in the diseased darkness, out there where the light of our Beloved Leader does not shine?  In that darkness there are only stinking, scurrying cockroaches . . . .”

And much more in the same vein. Timon was a highly intelligent man and didn’t need to rant this way.  On this occasion, current events had clearly taken him by surprise and rattled him.  He may also have thought this was the way to sway the proles, and so far it certainly had been working for him. (He repeated the speech in fluent Mandarin, Arabic, Spanish, and a few other languages.)  In any case, everyone who heard him this time—just about everyone, period—knew that something was going on.


The Great Reunion

One day in the fall of that year I was sitting on a bus bench waiting for a bus that might or might not come. A man came and sat down next to me. I noticed he was wearing a small wooden cross on a necklace, in flagrant defiance of Authority regulations. He was asking to be arrested. When he noticed me staring at the cross, he smiled and nodded and said, “Yes, I’m one of them. Don’t feel obligated to talk with me, though. They are probably watching.”  By “them” and “they” he meant two entirely different groups.

I murmured that I wasn’t afraid of them (we knew which “them” I meant), although I was. He went on speaking in a low voice, looking across the mostly empty street, hardly moving his lips. He spoke about what he called the Great Reunion. Yes, it was exactly what the rumors said, and more. It was a fulfillment of Bible prophecy—he mentioned the twelfth chapter of Zechariah and the eleventh of Romans. It was an act of God; no human persuasion could produce such consequences. It was happening all over the world, and it was making waves—not only waves of alarm and suppression within the Authority, but waves of what he called “witness conversions.” The tears of joy, he said, were contagious. It was like a million birthday parties everywhere, or a million million, and people were flocking to join in.

He stopped speaking and glanced my way with a half smile, then looking away again he said, “I don’t know how much you are aware of what’s been going on. Around the world, I mean, with the spread of the gospel.”

He paused, apparently waiting for a response, and when I gave none he went on, “Up until forty or fifty years ago the news about Jesus was being disseminated mainly by missionaries, most of them from the West. But then a shift took place, and ever since it’s been the people receiving the gospel, in every part of the world, who have been passing it on to their neighbors—to the tribe in the next valley who speak a dialect of their language, or the people further up in the hills. All of this has been going on under the radar, largely unnoticed. And it’s all over the planet—South America, Polynesia, Africa, Indonesia, India, China.  China!”

Muted excitement made it hard for him to keep up the deadpan ventriloquist act.  He continued: “When the last foreign missionaries left China in the 1930’s, their converts could be numbered in the thousands. Then all kinds of hell broke loose there, and in the midst of that, those converts became missionaries to their own people. Now, a century later, there are three or four hundred million Jesus-followers in China, around a quarter of the entire population. And that’s just China—as I said, the same thing has been happening all over. Do you know what Jesus said about this? He said that his story would be told among every people group in the world, and then he would come back for his followers. That day is coming into sight. It’s even happening in the Muslim world; they seem particularly susceptible to the joy of the Messiah.  Well, their choice now is pretty much down to this Messiah or . . . that one.  The Man of sorrows who is acquainted with their grief, or the one who inflicts it.”

I may have given a skeptical grunt at that point, but he just smiled to himself and went on, “And what about the Jews? With the Assyrian and Babylonian invasions, centuries before Christ, most of them were carried away as slaves and scattered around those empires.  Many fled to Egypt and wound up spreading across Africa. Then the Roman conquest of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. produced another diaspora, a more nearly permanent one.  Except for those who returned to Palestine and formed the nation of Israel after the second war, the Jews remain where they have been for two millenia, scattered throughout the world.  They are not as many as the Christians, but like the Christians they are in the nooks and crannies.  And when they came together with the Christians in the Reunion . . . well, it became a critical mass, and then a good explosion.”
I couldn’t let that one pass. “Good?  Don’t you know what they’re doing with you people?”

“What they feel they have to do. I’ll probably be arrested in the next hour or two. I want to tell them what I’ve been telling you.”

“Why me?  Why are you telling me?”

“You’re a historian. You’re even writing a history.”

An alarm shivered through me. “How do you know about that?”

He shrugged and stood up.  “The Authority doesn’t have a monopoly on eyes and ears.”  He nodded to me and walked off down the street.  He was either braver than me or crazier than me. Maybe both.


Now You See Them

He surely needed to be braver. As soon as the Authority caught wind of what was going on—that would be soon after it started, back in the spring—they geared up for a crackdown. They began rounding up the “fanatics,” beating many of them to death in the process and herding the rest into concentration camps. Already existing camps were hurriedly expanded to contain all the new criminals, but it wasn’t nearly enough.  The Authority had simply failed to comprehend the scale of this maniacal defection.

The fanatics usually put up no resistance to their arrest, however. The man on the bus bench had told me that this passivity was a novel experience for the “completed” Jews, as he called them—previously they would have fought tooth and nail with a defiant shout of “Never again!” But now that they knew their final destination, being forced into a shortcut no longer mattered.

Even with little resistance, though, there were just too many of these zealots. Hundreds of new camps were hastily constructed during the winter of 2028-29, and the SP began killing more of the traitors rather than herding them. But that strategy had intractable problems too. The Nazis had spent several years working on ways to dispose of the bodies of six million Jews. What do you do when you have to deal with two or three billion bodies?

The answer is that they did the best they could.  Burying and burning, by late summer in 2029 they had disposed of many more bodies than the Nazis’ six million.  Millions more were in the camps. Unprecedented plans and projects were under way for dealing with the rest.

At this point, however, the story becomes starkly mysterious. The Authority, of course, has clamped down on all information about whatever it is that happened. Rumor calls it the Disappearance. Tales are whispered—the SP truck was stuffed full of those people, and suddenly it was empty—she was sitting across the room, and then she wasn’t. I myself didn’t see anyone actually disappear, but in the following weeks and months there definitely were fewer people, and the missing were those joyful martyrs, the Judeo-Christians.

By most accounts, this bizarre event occurred on Monday, September 10, which just happened to be Rosh HaShanah, the Jewish feast of Trumpets, the feast that heralds the beginning of the new year and, according to some rabbis, re-enacts the creation of the world.

I have no idea what actually happened. Could their God really have whisked them away?  The Authority’s explanation is even less credible: “All selfish and treasonable elements have been eliminated.”  Maybe so, but how, and by whom?




Chapter 8:  The Horror

“You are all nothing but filthy rodents.” Timon Sadanta, Yom Kippur, 2030


Unless they engineered it, about which I have already expressed my doubts, the Disappearance was perhaps an even greater shock to the World Authority and its Leader than it was to the rest of us.  In one sense, I suppose, it must have come as a relief to them, a gigantic problem solved. In deeper ways, though, it must have left them shaken. However that may be, their response was to make sure nothing like that ever happened again.

Protection and Production

In October 2029, one month after the Disappearance, the Leader announced a tightening of his security measures, “to secure the complete protection of all our loyal citizens” (perhaps by oversight, he didn’t say “subjects”).  The first complete protection measure was a microchip implanted on the back of everyone’s right hand. This chip contained full personal information and enabled the SP to track everyone’s movements, plus serving as the new ration card.  We all had two weeks in which to report to our local police headquarters and get the implant, at which time we also swore allegiance to the Leader, “sparing myself nothing, not even my life.”  Those who failed to report would be regarded as traitors—spared nothing.  Even so, there were those (I don’t know how many) who went underground and tried to survive however they could.  As a backup measure to the personal chips, eyeball scanners were installed at many government locations—food stores, medical facilities, and the like—to ensure against any conceivable form of cheating.

In addition to being protected, we needed to be productive. Most people not already part of the government bureaucracy were conscripted into factory work units in cities around the world, to produce the goods needed by the Authority. The supposedly discredited command economy was back with a vengeance. We weren’t called conscripts, actually, we were called volunteers. Anyone who didn’t volunteer willingly, out of love and devotion to the Leader, underwent “intensive sensitivity training.”  The slogan trumpeting this operation, on factory walls and billboards everywhere, was “Work Makes You Free.”  As for myself, I was assigned to a fish processing plant, monitoring a computer screen for twelve hours a day, seven days a week. That work slowed my progress on finishing this history, but it was better than working the processing line.

Another thing the man on the bus bench said, something he found “interesting,” is that “the more we are deprived of all the old luxuries, the less we care about them. What’s left are the things that matter—that always mattered, but we didn’t always see them.”  I’m not sure whether by “us” he meant all of us or just people like him who court the attention of the SP.  Whatever he meant, people like him aren’t the only ones who, in their own way, risk that attention even if they don’t court it.


The Network

During this time it was increasingly difficult to obtain reliable information about what was really going on in the world.  The Authority controlled the media absolutely, so that nothing you heard on omnivision or the Internet could be believed.  You could see what was happening locally and draw your own conclusions, but it was hard to determine what was going on fifty miles away, not to mention five thousand miles away. What I and several hundred other like-minded people have depended on is an omnicommlink network we formed—presciently, as it turned out—a couple of years before the Leader came to power.  When we saw his handwriting on the wall, we devised a fairly elaborate code, using innocuous words, phrases and clauses to mean something quite different.  So far it has worked reasonably well, but that may change at any time; the SP have some intelligent analysts in their ranks.  If and when I distribute this history, it may prove to be our final communication.  Our plan is for each of us to immediately send it on to twenty or thirty others, and so on from there.  My estimate is that the Authority will ultimately manage to squelch it—certainly they will squelch us—but our alternative is just to knuckle under, which is unacceptable.

By means of this network I have learned something of what is actually going on in various places. Here are a few particulars. In Sydney the great problem is water rationing.  Owing to the prolonged drought in Australia and the way the Authority has managed the crisis since they took over, people in Sydney are down to three litres of water per person per day—enough for drinking in the winter, not quite enough for drinking in the summer, and none for flushing toilets or washing anything.  There have been sporadic riots on account of this, but the SP used assault rifles and machine guns to calm things down.

Beijing is one vast prison.  The prisoners are herded to work at gunpoint, then herded back to their cramped dormitories sometime in the night, where they are fed watery rice soup.  Their guards are all Chinese; apparently the Authority had no difficulty converting Communist Party officials into officers of the new regime, or recruiting Red Army soldiers into the SP. I have reason to think my network contact in Beijing is, one way or another, defunct.

San Diego has been one of the hardest places for the Authority to exert control over.  Around 2022 the city was largely taken over by the Zetas drug cartel out of northern Mexico, amid continual, brutal fighting.  The fighting only intensified when the World Authority was established in 2026.  In the summer of 2027 the Leader sent in thousands of crack SP troops in armored vehicles, spearheaded by around a hundred U.S. Army M2 tanks.  They killed many of the cartel soldiers and drove the rest underground.  Though the city is largely pacified now, the Zetas continue to carry out terrorist attacks.  The roughly two million residents, mostly Hispanic, are cowed, afraid, and hungry.

London is probably typical of most large cities in the former advanced nations. The sea level rise and heighted storms in the North Atlantic and North Sea have caused extensive and repeated flooding. Economic conditions have been grim, but even so, the conversion from a free market economy to a command economy did not take place easily or overnight. The Authority used both carrots and sticks—persuasion and force. Persuasion took the form of intensive propaganda, saturation coverage on omnivision, Internet, billboards, brochures and flyers, all loaded with promises and visions of the future. Force, as usual, took the form of battalions of SP followed by divisions of bureaucrats taking over municipal offices, commercial buildings and private businesses.

One must keep in mind the whirlwind sequence in which all this occurred in September of 2026.  On the seventh and eighth came the final collapse of the global financial system, one of its centers being the City of London.  Only a week later, on the fifteenth, the Triple Coalition (Germany, Russia and Iran) was expanded to the Complete Coalition, which included Great Britain.  From the standpoint of states like Britain, joining the coalition was an act of desperation, a dying hope that some sort of phoenix might arise out of the ashes.  So when, just a few days later, the forces of the Authority emerged out of the woodwork—they were, of course, mostly Britons, another well-stocked fifth column—the British government was already committed to the new order, for better or worse. It was a confusing, desperate time for everyone. As in most places there were some who put up resistance; they were taken into custody at gunpoint.  Since that time the local economy has only worsened.  There are long lines for dwindling staples.  There is a black market for most essential goods—food, clothing, sacks of coal—but it has to stay very “black” because the SP are always hunting it down to exterminate it.

My contact in Capetown reports on a city of the dead and dying.  Those who are still alive are reduced by disease and starvation to a feeble listlessness.  They hardly have the strength left to bury the dead.  It’s like one of those villages decimated by the plague in the Middle Ages, but this is a sprawling city.  Most of Africa, probably, is no better off.

In Moscow they are not all dying yet, but the city is quiet.  There is little protest and almost no insurrection.  Muscovites are accustomed to being regimented.  They are also accustomed to doing without, though not on this scale.  As in most other places there is disease, hunger, and some starvation.  Many apartments and dormitories go unheated in the winter, so some people, especially the elderly, freeze to death.  The Authority does at least keep vodka widely available to numb the pain and hasten the end.


The New World Order

In March 2030 the Leader gave a major address in which he announced the inauguration of what he called the New World Order.  He spoke seated behind a large desk, the way U.S. presidents used to, flanked by the flag of the World Authority (a blue and green global Earth on a black background) and a new flag, presumably that of the New World Order (also black, with some symbols that were obscured by the folds).  He looked tanned and vigorous; also, as ever, handsome, steely and commanding. But the irresistible smile with which he charmed the world in the past was gone. He began by recounting all that the Authority had achieved over the last three years.

“Good evening to you all.  I have an announcement to make that will be of concern to all of you, but first I will remind you of what you already know.  Over the last three years, since we rescued every nation in the world from a catastrophic collapse brought on by your own stubborn greed and belligerence, we have brought peace where there was conflict and war.  We have brought stability where there was unrest and rioting. We have purged out the worst elements of arrogance and hatred.  We have brought order where there was disorder—that is, we have brought order to every corner of the world. We have given you what you failed to give yourselves.

“We have done all this with wisdom and firmness, as a father would do with his children. As you know, however, children do not always receive a father’s guidance with gratitude and compliance. Children do not like being disciplined. They complain that they are being treated unfairly.  They whine and whimper.

“Now, considering all that we have done for the nations and peoples of the world, do we not have the right to expect a positive and cheerful response? Would not such a response be the least we should expect from our beneficiaries? Certainly it would be, but is that the response we have received?  It is not. Instead, our efforts have been met in every quarter with a sullen, frowning, childish negativity.  I see you, everywhere, pouting and sulking like spoiled brats.  As any good father would be, I am deeply disappointed in you. As your Leader, I am not satisfied with your progress up to this point.

“As your Leader, however, I have a responsibility to see to it that your priorities are straightened out. I have a responsibility to persevere in discipline until it bears its fruit in your lives.  I have a responsibility not only to bring order to your lives but also to bring an appreciation of order, an embrace of order.  And to this end, I will unveil to you the way in which such an appreciation, such an embrace—I would say, even, such a love—is now going to be achieved.

“Beginning immediately, we announce and decree the New World Order. We give you one new and simple First Order: You will henceforth, on all occasions and under all circumstances, respond to our leading with a constantly positive and cheerful obedience.  You are now a happy and joyful people.  When our officers or our agents give you an order, you will jump to obey with a smile and a salute.  As you grow in this discipline, your smiles and your salutes will become ever more heartfelt.  Down in the core of your being, you will understand and feel that what we command is always for the best, always the right thing. And as you undergo this process, over time, you will begin to grow up.  Eventually you will no longer be children.  You will know that in cheerful obedience, in work, in serving, you are truly free.

“But for the present you must trust us.  You must obey us, like good children, with a positive and grateful spirit.  Otherwise your discipline will be such as no child should have to endure.  Trust us.  That is all.”

As with Sadanta’s speech at the time of the “tears of joy” movement, this speech was delivered, successively, in many languages.  The Leader has his characteristic ways of putting things—this time he was in his “stern father” mode—but I think we all got the point.  It was crackdown time.


A Tale of Two Magicians

As I have already said, the Leader had selected Jerusalem as his capital, and the rebuilding of the Jewish Temple was his pet project.  All possible resources were devoted to its construction.  Marble was shipped and trucked in from all over the region. Gold and silver, well guarded of course, were brought in by the ton.  By the time he gave his New World Order speech, the Temple was almost complete. By all accounts, and as shown frequently on omnivision, it was nothing short of spectacular. If they didn’t feel upstaged, Solomon and Herod would be pleased.

It was at this point, after the speech, that another strange episode occurred (for “strange episodes” I refer the reader to the Leader’s apparent death at the hands of Leo Scharrens, followed by his apparent “resurrection,” and also the Disappearance).  As before, I relate this event with a good deal of skepticism.  Though it is said to have taken place in public and in broad daylight, the Authority, for reasons that will become clear, kept all sight or mention of it off of omnivision and the Internet.  It is a matter of rumor only, but the rumors are so prevalent and vivid that, as a historian, I must report them.

Here, then, is the story.  In the great square in front of the Temple, while the masons and artisans were completing their work, two men showed up one day. Bearded and shabbily dressed, they appeared to have been homeless for some time. That in itself was normal enough these days, but these two were not normal.  They stood on one of the steps leading to the Temple, one on either side, and started haranguing passers-by with loud pronouncements that seared their ears and sent them scurring off so they wouldn’t be arrested with the blasphemers. As to exactly what they were saying, reports vary.  According to some, they were railing against the Leader, denouncing him as a usurper and a phony.  Dangerous words indeed!—if that’s what they were saying.  Most of the rumors, though, have them quoting biblical verses and similar things, rather like the text of Handel’s Messiah—behold the Lamb, Prince of peace, my Redeemer liveth, and so forth. Sayings like that could be ambiguous as to which Messiah was being proclaimed— they might be heralding the Leader’s imminent exaltation. Evidently not, though, because (according to report) the forbidden name of Jesus kept cropping up in their quotations.  Nor did the Authority look favorably on their activities.  The SP swept onto the scene almost immediately.

This is where the story grows truly strange.  When the uniformed thugs rushed in to collar them, they ran up against something like an invisible wall of fire and bounced back, badly burned, their clothing aflame.  Others raised their guns and opened fire, but when they did the guns exploded in their faces.

Now, this whole story may be sheer fable—probably is—but it is so delicious that I can’t resist giving it some play.

Police:  “What the hell is this? Stop this or you’re dead men!”
Man:  “If the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead is living in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit, who lives in you.”
Police:  “You can’t talk like that!  Don’t you know where you are?”
Man:  “There is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.”
Police:  “That’s it!  Fire another round!”  (More guns explode.)
Man:  “He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadow of
the Almighty.”
Police:  “Call in the tanks!”

But the tanks did no good either.  The two men were simply invulnerable and continued with their “prophesying” straight through to the present time.  If rumor can be believed.


Yom Kippur

For me, as for most others, the next several months were a time of keeping your head down, working your assigned hours, no matter how long and strenuous, and trying to avoid contact with the SP or any other Authority agents.  When they did bark at you, you smiled and did their bidding.  It’s called survival.  By that time, my main reason for wanting to survive was to finish this account and, if possible, send it out.

In July the Authority announced preparations for a major event, purportedly “world-changing,” scheduled for Sunday October 6.  For one thing, it was going to be the dedication of the new Temple in Jerusalem.  The Temple was, naturally, going to be dedicated not to any of the old gods but to the new ones, or the new One.  The announcements didn’t spell this out directly, but it wasn’t going to come as much of a surprise either.  The weekly parades and festivals in honor of the Leader grew longer and more intense. Excitement was whipped up, sometimes literally. They began rehearsing us for our command performance when the great day came.  Some of us who excelled in this performance were shipped to Jerusalem for round-the-clock (minus eight hours for sleep) rehearsal.  I was not among those (I didn’t excel in performance), but at the end of our work shift each day we were all herded into auditoriums and theaters where we spent an hour or two viewing the preparations in Jerusalem on giant omnivision screens. We were expected to cheer, with the threat of more “intensive sensitivity training” if we didn’t.  In none of these viewings, by the way, did I see those two shabby Bible-spouting magicians doing their prophesying on the Temple steps. On the other hand, the cameras never showed the Temple steps, either.  It left you wondering.

Another thing to wonder about:  It was brought to my attention—not by the Authority—that the night of October 6 begins the Jewish feast of Yom Kippur this year.  This is a coincidence to ponder.  The mysterious Disappearance of all those Jews and Christians occurred, it seems, on the feast of Rosh HaShanah one year ago.  And now the dedication of the new Temple is scheduled on another Jewish holy day. One explanation of the coincidence would be that the Leader has been masterminding the whole thing, for reasons yet to be revealed. Ever since he came to power it has been obvious that he has some sort of Messiah complex. But that would mean he somehow engineered the Disappearance, and I don’t see how even he could have pulled that off.  And while we ponder coincidences, we need to factor in that whole peculiar “tears of joy” movement that led to the Disappearance. For dead sure, the Leader didn’t mastermind that.  But he must be aware of the timing of Yom Kippur. He is the one, after all, who chose Jerusalem as his capital and ordered the Temple to be rebuilt. Why all this obsession with Jewish things?  I’m pretty sure he isn’t Jewish, except in the way that most of us have at least a few drops of Jewish blood (along with almost every other kind) in our veins.

All of this puzzled me, but what lies at the root of it, I thought, has to be his demented fixation on being not merely a political dictator—absolute monarch—but a personal religious epiphany:  the Messiah.


When the big day finally came, it answered some of these questions, but with strange and sinister answers.


Darkness

As I mentioned before, October 6 came on a Sunday this year—that is, the year 2030, which draws to its chilling end as I write.  Normally, under the New Order edict, we now worked seven days a week, but not on that Sunday.  In the morning we were formed into “inspirational study groups” of about thirty each. Under the watchful eye of one of Sadanta’s Light Bearers, backed by a couple of armed SP, we took turns reading aloud from speeches and articles by our Leader or Sadanta. On this occasion, even more than usually, looking less than enthusiastic was risky.

The climax of all that day’s festivities was scheduled to come at midnight with the dedication of the Temple.  Exactly what that would involve was not disclosed in advance. Around ten in the evening we were once again packed into theaters and auditoriums—I assume the same thing was going on all over the world.  Then the lights were turned off and the big screen transported us to Jerusalem (the illusion, I must admit, was quite good). We not only saw the streets of the ancient city thronged with well-drilled celebrants, we felt as if we were among them, thrusting our right arms skyward in salute and shouting ourselves hoarse in praise of our Deliverer and Protector.  Slowly the crowds, with us virtually in their midst, converged on the vast and splendid stairway leading up to the great front gate of the Temple.

And there, with a bit of a jolt, I saw them—not very clearly, because at that point the cameras zoomed back to give a wide-angle view of the huge procession—but there the two bearded prophets were, one on either end of the stairway, still holding forth with whatever they were preaching (of course we couldn’t hear them).  The procession up into the Temple courts, led by thousands of white-robed Light Bearers holding aloft what looked like genuine torches, flowed around the two untouchables as though repelled by a force field, which I suppose in fact they were.

The Temple was illuminated on the outside by ground-level floodlights and on the inside by a myriad of six-branched candlestands, rather like ersatz menorahs. On the towering walls were displayed many curious symbols whose real meaning was known only to initiates in the Light of Man cult.

What you noticed first, though, when the camera brought us further inside, was the Leader standing in the center of the Holy Place. But this was the Leader much larger than life, perhaps forty feet tall, dressed in a shimmering golden robe. It wasn’t a statue, because he moved, he was alive. It may have been some kind of hologram.  Beside and a little behind him, appearing about thirty feet tall, was Timon Sadanta in a silvery robe with a large flared collar.  My estimate of their size is based on comparison with all the people spread out before them, who were still assembling into their assigned places and who looked like Lilliputians.

Soon the Light Bearers, joined by the rest of the endless throng, were singing the hymns of praise to the Leader that we had all been rehearsing for months. The sound of all those voices resounding throughout the old city and reverberating within the Temple was spine-tingling. For safety’s sake I was moving my lips, but I was almost swept up into singing out with the rest.  Almost.  But just think:  virtually everyone on the planet was singing the same thing at the same time. Awe-inspiring or creepy, depending on your attitude.

Then the Leader, holding out those giant arms in those golden sleeves as if to embrace (or perhaps to devour) all his worshipers, began to intone in a voice that resonated around the earth:

“Who am I?  I am who I am.  No one gave me all that I possess: It is all of myself, by myself, and for myself.  As are all of you:  You live at my mercy.  As long as you are of some use to me, you may live. Your life and your death are in my hands.  I am the ever-living One, and in these hands is death.”

Slowly he lowered his arms, and then Sadanta—or that towering image of him (he certainly looked real)—stepped forward, right up to the first rank of worshipers until I thought he might crush some of them, and shouted out harshly:

“And who are you?  You are all nothing but filthy rodents, good for nothing but to serve, and work, and die.  Some of you will yelp to me, ‘But we are human beings —the divine nature lives in us!’  You lie!  You lie and you die!”  [Here he pointed to various people in the crowd, who collapsed to the floor.  I doubt if their death was faked.]  “You are nothing, worthless drones.  There is no God except your Leader, whom you worship this night.  In the past, many of you worshiped other gods—now you see what they have done for you. Nothing! They too are worthless.  Now you serve only at the mercy of your Leader.

“And here you are, gathered to worship him in this glorious Temple, in the holy city of Jerusalem.  Jerusalem!  Zion!  Some of you, of course, are Jews.  You will say to me, ‘We are safe because our Leader has made a covenant with us, to protect us from our enemies.’  You lie!  He is not your Leader—you are Jews!  You are scum, good only to kiss the ground and die. Scum!  You have a covenant, yes, a covenant with death.
  
“We who stand before you are here to dedicate this Temple, and we, here and now, dedicate it to the only true God:  the Leader!  [Here he paused while the multitudes roared their acclamation, either sincerely or hopelessly.]

“It is midnight. All over the earth, the night has fallen. The Leader reigns: Who can resist him?  Who can stand against him?”  [Here he shot up his right fist.]  “We defy them all!  None can stand against him!  The darkness has triumphed!  The Leader reigns!”

Suddenly all the lights in the city, including all the thousands of candles in the Temple, went out, and we were plunged into darkness. (I can only assume this was part of the Leader’s choreography.)  In that darkness the invisible throng started cheering wildly again, chanting “Leader! Leader!” over and over again.  That went on for perhaps half an hour, until the lights went back on in an entirely unexpected way—a way I don’t see how even the Leader or Sadanta could have planned.  The skies overhead suddenly burst out in a tremendous aurora—dazzling, undulating waves of light in every hue of the rainbow—caused, I suppose, by unprecedented solar flares.  The light pulsated as it rippled and billowed; electricity or sheet lightning crackled and flashed across the firmament, and it sounded like a hundred peals of thunder all in the same moment.  It was the fireworks from hell.  All the terrorist attacks of the last fifty years, put together, didn’t terrorize the world’s people as much as the last twenty four hours had.  We were well and truly terrorized.


Hard Time

That uncanny spectacle continued through the night and only faded away with the coming of what seemed like a reluctant dawn.  Meanwhile the stunned, disoriented worshipers were driven out of the Temple and back to their various work assignments. This confused ending to the great ceremony suggests to me that it wasn’t part of the plan. However that may be, when morning came it was with an ominous difference. The skies—worldwide, as best I can tell—were dimmed with a reddish haze. The sun was a bloody circle behind the smoke (or whatever it was) and all ambient light was shrouded in red.  A few months later, as I write this, it hasn’t changed.

But that whole uncanny episode did seem to bring on or at least hasten a change in our Leader. He had gone from being the charismatic superstar to being the remote, baleful incarnation of deity.  Now, taking Sadanta’s ravings completely to heart, he has come back down to earth as the rabid hound of hell. What before were voiced as threats are now carried out as policy.

Seemingly overnight the ranks of the Special Police were greatly multiplied. The Leader must have been recruiting and training (or barbarizing) them in camps around the world for months.  Martial law, which we have essentially been living under for a year or two, has now become official and unsparing. The SP carry short whips along with their guns and billy clubs, and they whip us just for the fun of it as we trudge to work and while we work. Probably because I am an older worker, they shifted me onto a “quality control” detail, which meant that they subcontracted some of their brutality onto me. I was ordered to “encourage” the other workers to work harder and faster by leaning up close and shouting “reminders” in their ears. I try to inject an ironic tone into my shouts, but if I tried to yell anything really encouraging to them (or insulting to the Leader) and the SP heard me, I would be dead on the spot and you would not be reading this.

At least I am not a woman. Life under this regime is, naturally, worse for them.  The SP are males without much residue of humanity to restrain them. (To be fully accurate, a few of them are women, but you wouldn’t know it.)  Some of my sources have reported that younger women are being forced into cult prostitution under the supremely cynical term of “holy virgins.”  The official cult, by the way, is no longer called the Light of Man but, more honestly, the Secret Dark.

What if North Korea had not been obliterated but had taken over the whole world. In effect, that is what has happened.  Being a bookish person, I am reminded of the dying words of Kurtz in Joseph Conrad’s novella Heart of Darkness.  The story takes place in Central Africa during the colonial period in the nineteenth century. Kurtz, a colonial trader deep in the jungle, has “gone native” in the worst way, combining primitive savagery with civilized power and efficiency.  But at the end of his life, according to the narrator, Kurtz looks deep within himself and sums up his life by crying out, “The horror, the horror!”  Conrad probably meant Kurtz to symbolize both the moral condition of the whole colonial enterprise and also, since colonizers are normal human beings, the moral condition of humanity itself.  Are we really as bad as that?  I don’t know—I am only a historian—but in our different ways we are all experiencing the horror together.